Development of an instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of teachers in guiding small groups

被引:26
作者
Dolmans, DHJM [1 ]
Wolfhagen, HAP [1 ]
Scherpbier, AJJA [1 ]
Van der Vleuten, CPM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, Sch Med, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
evaluation; feedback; problem-based learning; teaching;
D O I
10.1023/A:1027388806218
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In many student-centred curricula, teachers work in small groups with students. Guiding small groups is rather complex. Teachers need to aim to stimulate students in these groups towards constructive, self-directed, contextual and collaborative learning. It is also important that teachers demonstrate adequate interpersonal behaviour towards students. In this study, an instrument was developed to provide teachers with feedback about their performance to improve their behaviour. The aim of this study is to report on the development, reliability and validity of an instrument to evaluate teachers' performance in guiding small groups. The items of the instrument were based on five theoretical dimensions: constructive, self-directed, contextual and collaborative learning and the teacher's interpersonal behaviour. Students were asked to fill out this instrument and evaluate the performance of the teacher guiding the small group at the end of several courses. The instrument was tested in a pilot-study. Confirmatory factor analysis and generalizability studies indicated that the instrument is fairly valid and reliable when six student responses are available per teacher. Teachers receive detailed feedback about their performance indicating strong and weak aspects. Further research is needed to determine whether this feedback indeed leads to improvement of teachers' behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 446
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AMOS USERS GUIDE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, New Learning, DOI [DOI 10.1007/0-306-47614-2_3, 10.1007/0-306-47614-2_3]
[3]  
Barrows H.S., 1988, The Tutorial Process
[4]  
Blumenfield P.C., 1996, LEARN INSTR, V6, P263
[5]   Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications [J].
Bransford, JD ;
Schwartz, DL .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 24 1999, 1999, 24 :61-100
[6]  
Braskamp L.A., 1994, Assessing faculty work: enhancing individual and institutional performance
[7]  
CRICK JE, 1983, MANUAL GENOVA GEN AN
[8]   Is tutor performance dependent on the tutorial group's productivity?: Toward further resolving of inconsistencies in tutor performance [J].
Dolmans, DHJM ;
Wolfhagen, IHAP ;
Hoogenboom, RJI ;
van der Vleuten, CPM .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1999, 11 (04) :186-191
[9]   The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective [J].
Ertmer, PA ;
Newby, TJ .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1996, 24 (01) :1-24
[10]  
Ertmer Peggy A, 1993, Performance Improvement Quarterly, V6, P50, DOI [10.1002/piq.21143, DOI 10.1002/PIQ.21143]