Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development

被引:222
作者
Espinosa, J. Alberto [1 ]
Slaughter, Sandra A.
Kraut, Robert E.
Herbsleb, James D.
机构
[1] American Univ, Kogod Sch Business, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
coordination; global software development; management of the information technology (IT) function; team knowledge;
D O I
10.2753/MIS0742-1222240104
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Coordination is important in software development because it leads to benefits such as cost savings, shorter development cycles, and better-integrated products. Team cognition research suggests that members coordinate through team knowledge, but this perspective has only been investigated in real-time collocated tasks and we know little about which types of team knowledge best help coordination in the most geographically distributed software work. In this field study, we investigate the coordination needs of software teams, how team knowledge affects coordination, and how this effect is influenced by geographic dispersion. Our findings show that software teams have three distinct types of coordination needs-technical, temporal, and process-and that these needs vary with the members' role; geographic distance has a negative effect on coordination, but is mitigated by shared knowledge of the team and presence awareness; and shared task knowledge is more important for coordination among collocated members. We articulate propositions for future research in this area based on our analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 169
页数:35
相关论文
共 84 条
[61]   CASE TOOLS AS ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE - INVESTIGATING INCREMENTAL AND RADICAL CHANGES IN SYSTEMS-DEVELOPMENT [J].
ORLIKOWSKI, WJ .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1993, 17 (03) :309-340
[62]   An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members [J].
Pauleen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 20 (03) :227-256
[63]   PEOPLE, ORGANIZATIONS, AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT [J].
PERRY, DE ;
STAUDENMAYER, NA ;
VOTTA, LG .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 1994, 11 (04) :36-45
[64]   Why do 'great minds' think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement [J].
Rentsch, JR ;
Klimoski, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 :107-120
[65]  
RENTSCH JR, 1994, ADV INTERDISCIPLINAR, V1, P223
[66]   ON LOOKING INTO THE BLACK-BOX - PROSPECTS AND LIMITS IN THE SEARCH FOR MENTAL MODELS [J].
ROUSE, WB ;
MORRIS, NM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 100 (03) :349-363
[67]   Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions [J].
Schultze, U ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2002, 26 (03) :213-242
[68]  
SILVESTER J, 1998, QUALITATIVE METHODS, P73
[69]  
Steinfield C., 1999, GROUP'99. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, P81, DOI 10.1145/320297.320306
[70]  
Strauss E, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P2