Perils, pitfalls, and possibilities in talking about medical risk

被引:157
作者
Bogardus, ST
Holmboe, E
Jekel, JF
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 281卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.281.11.1037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Virtually every course of medical action is associated with some adverse risk to the patient. Discussing these risks with patients is a fundamental duty of physicians both to fulfill a role as trusted adviser and to promote the ethical principle of autonomy (particularly as embodied in the doctrine of informed consent). Discussing medical risk is a difficult task to accomplish appropriately. Challenges stem from gaps in the physician's knowledge about pertinent risks, uncertainty about how much and what kind of information to communicate, and difficulties in communicating risk information in a format that is clearly understood by most patients. For example, a discussion of the risk of undergoing a procedure should be accompanied by a discussion of the risk of not undergoing a procedure. This article describes basic characteristics of risk information, outlines major challenges in communicating risk information, and suggests several ways to communicate risk information to patients in an understandable format. Ultimately, a combination of formats (eg, qualitative, quantitative, and graphic) may best accommodate the widely varying needs, preferences, and abilities of patients. Such communication will help the physician accomplish the fundamental duty of teaching the patient the information necessary to make an informed and appropriate decision.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1041
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
MAZUR DJ, 1998, MED RISK RIGHT INFOR
[22]  
*MERR WEBST INC, 1996, MERR WEBST COLL DICT
[23]   NUMBERS ARE BETTER THAN WORDS - VERBAL SPECIFICATIONS OF FREQUENCY HAVE NO PLACE IN MEDICINE [J].
NAKAO, MA ;
AXELROD, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 74 (06) :1061-1065
[24]   IMPACT OF PATIENT PREFERENCES ON THE SELECTION OF THERAPY [J].
PAUKER, SG ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1981, 34 (2-3) :77-86
[25]   INFERENCE AND DECISION AT THE BEDSIDE [J].
SACKETT, DL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (04) :309-316
[26]   HIGH-RISK OR LOW - HOW LOCATION ON A RISK LADDER AFFECTS PERCEIVED RISK [J].
SANDMAN, PM ;
WEINSTEIN, ND ;
MILLER, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (01) :35-45
[27]   EFFECTS OF OUTCOME FRAMING ON TREATMENT DECISIONS IN THE REAL WORLD - IMPACT OF FRAMING ON ADJUVANT BREAST-CANCER DECISIONS [J].
SIMINOFF, LA ;
FETTING, JH .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1989, 9 (04) :262-271
[28]   PERCEPTION OF RISK [J].
SLOVIC, P .
SCIENCE, 1987, 236 (4799) :280-285
[29]   THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4481) :453-458
[30]   JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - HEURISTICS AND BIASES [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4157) :1124-1131