Scale issues in land-atmosphere interactions: implications for remote sensing of the surface energy balance

被引:55
作者
Brunsell, NA [1 ]
Gillies, RR
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Plants Soils & Biometeorol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Aquat Watershed & Earth Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
scaling; SGP97; length scales; surface energy balance;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00064-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The interaction between the land surface and the atmosphere is discussed focusing on the recent literature. Of primary importance is the issue of scale and the variation across different levels of pixel resolution for using remotely sensed data in the determination of the different components of the surface energy balance (SEB). This leads into a discussion of various methods of aggregating local scale input parameters in order to calculate larger scale surface fluxes. As an example application, airborne and satellite data are coupled to a soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer (SVAT) model and applied to the Southern Great Plains 1997 (SGP97) Hydrology Experiment. A physically based aggregation scheme is suggested for radiometric temperature by decomposing the temperature into vegetation and soil components and then aggregating the radiance field based on the percent cover of vegetation. Fluxes derived from the airborne data agree well with those measured with eddy covariance stations. Satellite data agrees poorly with the surface and airborne estimates. However, after aggregating the airborne data to the resolution of the satellite, the agreement is better. This suggests that the satellite data is useful at estimating the fluxes at the 1 km(2) scale, while the comparison between the 1 km(2) satellite and the surface data may be problematic at such scales. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 221
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
Giorgi F, 1997, MON WEATHER REV, V125, P1885, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1885:AAFTRO>2.0.CO
[22]  
2
[23]   Surface-flux aggregation in heterogeneous terrain [J].
Hasager, CB ;
Jensen, NO .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 125 (558) :2075-2102
[24]   Approaches for aggregating heterogeneous surface parameters and fluxes for mesoscale and climate models [J].
Hu, ZL ;
Islam, S ;
Jiang, L .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1999, 93 (02) :313-336
[25]  
KNIEZYS FX, 1996, AFGLTR880177
[26]   MODELING THE LAND SURFACE BOUNDARY IN CLIMATE MODELS AS A COMPOSITE OF INDEPENDENT VEGETATION STANDS [J].
KOSTER, RD ;
SUAREZ, MJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D3) :2697-2715
[27]   DETERMINATION OF SENSIBLE HEAT-FLUX OVER SPARSE CANOPY USING THERMAL INFRARED DATA [J].
KUSTAS, WP ;
CHOUDHURY, BJ ;
MORAN, MS ;
REGINATO, RJ ;
JACKSON, RD ;
GAY, LW ;
WEAVER, HL .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1989, 44 (3-4) :197-216
[28]  
Kustas WP, 2002, J APPL METEOROL, V41, P319, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0319:IOUDTA>2.0.CO
[29]  
2
[30]  
Kustas WP, 2001, J HYDROMETEOROL, V2, P254, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0254:VOPARS>2.0.CO