Effects of two target-controlled concentrations (1 and 3 ng/ml) of remifentanil on MACBAR of sevoflurane

被引:93
作者
Albertin, A [1 ]
Casati, A [1 ]
Bergonzi, P [1 ]
Fano, G [1 ]
Torri, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp San Raffaele, Dept Anesthesiol, Ist Ricovero & Cura Carattere Sci, I-20132 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200402000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to determine the effects of two different target-controlled concentrations of remifentanil (1 and 3 ng/ ml) on the sevoflurane requirement for blunting sympathetic responses after surgical incision (MAC(BAR)). Methods: Seventy-four patients aged 20-50 yr, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, were anesthetized with propofol, cisatracurium, and sevoflurane with a mixture of 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Then, patients were randomly allocated to receive no remifentanil infusion (n = 27) or a target-controlled plasma concentration of 1 ng/ml (n = 27) or 3 ng/ml remifentanil (n = 20). Sympathetic responses to surgical incision (presence or absence of an increase in either heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure of 15% or more above the mean of the values measured during the 2 min before skin incision) were determined after a 20-min period of stable end-tidal sevoflurane and target-controlled remifentanil concentrations. Predetermined end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations and the MAC(BAR) for each group were determined using an up-and-down sequential-allocation technique. Results: The MAC(BAR) of sevoflurane was higher in the group receiving no remifentanil (2.8% [95% confidence interval: 2.5-3.0%]) as compared with patients of the groups receiving 1 ng/ml (1.1% [0.9-1.3%]; P = 0.012) and 3 ng/ml remifentanil (0.2% [0.1-0.3%]; P = 0.006). When considering a minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) value in this age population and the contribution of 60% nitrous oxide (0.55 MAC), the combined MAC(BAR) values, expressed as multiples of the MAC, were 1.95 MAC, 1.1 MAC, and 0.68 MAC, in the three groups, respectively. Conclusion: A target-controlled concentration of 1 ng/ml remifentanil results in a 60% decrease in the MAC(BAR) of sevoflurane combined with 60% nitrous oxide. Increasing the target concentration of remifentanil to 3 ng/ml produces a further 30% decrease in the MAC(BAR) values of sevoflurane.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 259
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil .2. Model application [J].
Minto, CF ;
Schnider, TW ;
Shafer, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (01) :24-33
[22]   Anesthetic doses of sevoflurane to block cardiovascular responses to incision when administered with xenon or nitrous oxide [J].
Nakata, Y ;
Goto, T ;
Ishiguro, Y ;
Terui, K ;
Niimi, Y ;
Morita, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (02) :369-373
[23]   ANESTHETIC DOSES BLOCKING ADRENERGIC (STRESS) AND CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO INCISION - MAC-BAR [J].
ROIZEN, MF ;
HORRIGAN, RW ;
FRAZER, BM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (05) :390-398
[24]   Monitoring depth of anaesthesia [J].
Schneider, G ;
Sebel, PS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 14 :21-28
[25]   PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF PROPOFOL INFUSIONS DURING GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
SHAFER, A ;
DOZE, VA ;
SHAFER, SL ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (03) :348-356
[26]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) AND ITS MAJOR METABOLITE (GI90291) IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INPATIENT SURGERY [J].
WESTMORELAND, CL ;
HOKE, JF ;
SEBEL, PS ;
HUG, CC ;
MUIR, KT .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) :893-903
[27]  
WETHERILL GB, 1963, J ROY STAT SOC B, V25, P1
[28]   ANESTHETIC DEPTH DEFINED USING MULTIPLE NOXIOUS STIMULI DURING ISOFLURANE/OXYGEN ANESTHESIA .2. HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES [J].
ZBINDEN, AM ;
PETERSENFELIX, S ;
THOMSON, DA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (02) :261-267