Organizational characteristics and funding environments: A study of a population of united way-affiliated nonprofits

被引:60
作者
Stone, MM [1 ]
Hager, MA
Griffin, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Hubert H Humphrey Inst Publ Affairs & Publ Affair, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Urban Inst, Ctr Nonprofits & Philantrophy, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Business & Publ Management, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0033-3352.00030
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This study examines a population of United Way-affiliated nonprofit organizations in Massachusetts (1) to test hypotheses generated by previous research on relationships between government funding and specific nonprofit organizational characteristics, (2) to compare differences in organizational characteristics between nonprofits receiving higher percentages of revenues From the United Way and from government sources, and (3) to explore associations between government funding and United Way and underexamined characteristics, including use of commercial income and racial diversity of organizational membership. The study supports previous research on the relationship between government funding and nonprofit characteristics, with one notable exception-less administrative complexity was associated with higher percentages of government funding. The study also finds differences in organizational characteristics between nonprofits with higher proportions of government funding and chose with higher percentages of United Way funding, including organization size, number of board members, administrative complexity, use of volunteers, and the racial diversity of boards, staff and volunteers.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 289
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]  
Salamon L. M., 1987, The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, P99
[32]  
Scott W.R., 1992, Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives
[33]  
Smith S., 1993, NONPROFITS HIRE
[34]   Transforming public services: Contracting for social and health services in the US [J].
Smith, SR .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1996, 74 (01) :113-127
[35]   DECENTRALIZING THE SOCIAL-SERVICE SYSTEM - A REASSESSMENT [J].
SOSIN, MR .
SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1990, 64 (04) :617-636
[37]  
*UWMB, 1994, ANN REP
[38]  
WARREN R, 1967, ADM SCI Q, V12, P143
[39]  
Weisbrod BA, 1997, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V16, P541
[40]  
Wolch J.R., 1990, The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition