Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance Imaging at 3.0T

被引:173
作者
Eckstein, F
Charles, HC
Buck, RJ
Kraus, VB
Remmers, AE
Hudelmaier, M
Wirth, W
Evelhoch, JL
机构
[1] Paracelsus Private Med Univ, Inst Anat & Musculoskeletal Res, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Chondrometr, Ainring, Germany
[3] Duke Univ, Image Anal Lab, Durham, NC USA
[4] Pfizer Global Res & Dev, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
来源
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM | 2005年 / 52卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/art.21348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage represents a powerful tool in osteoarthritis (OA) research, but has so far been confined to a field strength of 1.5T. The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of quantitative MRI assessments of human cartilage morphology at 3.0T and to correlate the measurements at 3.0T with validated measurements at 1.5T. Methods. MR images of the knee of 15 participants with OA and 15 healthy control subjects were acquired using Siemens 1.5T and 3.0T scanners. Double oblique coronal scans were obtained at 1.5T with a 1.5-mm partition thickness, at 3.0T with a 1.5-mm partition thickness, and at 3.0T with a 1.0-mm partition thickness. Cartilage volume, thickness, and surface area of the femorotibial cartilage plates were quantified using proprietary software. Results. For 1.5-mm partition thickness at 1.5T, the precision error was 3.0% and 2.6% for cartilage volume and cartilage thickness, respectively. The error was smaller for a 1.5-mm partition thickness at 3.0T (2.6% and 2.5%) and still smaller for a 1.0-mm partition thickness at 3.0T (2.1% and 2.0%). Correlation coefficients between values obtained at 3.0T and 1.5T were high (r >= 0.96), with no significant deviation between the two field strengths. Conclusion. Quantitative MRI measurement of cartilage morphology at 3.0T (partition thickness 1 mm) was found to be accurate and tended to be more reproducible than at 1.5T (partition thickness 1.5 mm). Imaging at 3.0T may therefore provide superior ability to detect changes in cartilage status over time and to determine responses to treatment with structure-modifying drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:3132 / 3136
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis
    Burgkart, R
    Glaser, C
    Hinterwimmer, S
    Hudelmaier, M
    Englmeier, KH
    Reiser, M
    Eckstein, F
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (10): : 2829 - 2835
  • [2] Burgkart R, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P2072, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2072::AID-ART357>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-3
  • [4] Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging
    Eckstein, F
    Glaser, C
    [J]. SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 8 (04) : 329 - 353
  • [5] Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI)
    Eckstein, F
    Heudorfer, L
    Faber, SC
    Burgkart, R
    Englmeier, KH
    Reiser, M
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2002, 10 (12) : 922 - 928
  • [6] Femoro-tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test-retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis
    Glaser, C
    Burgkart, R
    Kutschera, A
    Englmeier, KH
    Reiser, M
    Eckstein, F
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (06) : 1229 - 1236
  • [7] Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Relaxation times and image contrast
    Gold, GE
    Han, E
    Stainsby, J
    Wright, G
    Brittain, J
    Beaulieu, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [8] Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging - Technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters
    Graichen, H
    Von Eisenhart-Rothe, R
    Vogl, T
    Englmeier, KH
    Eckstein, F
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2004, 50 (03): : 811 - 816
  • [9] Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis
    Gray, ML
    Eckstein, F
    Peterfy, C
    Dahlberg, L
    Kim, YJ
    Sorensen, AG
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (427) : S175 - S181
  • [10] Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo
    Hohe, J
    Ateshian, G
    Reiser, M
    Englmeier, KH
    Eckstein, F
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (03) : 554 - 561