Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Relaxation times and image contrast

被引:427
作者
Gold, GE
Han, E
Stainsby, J
Wright, G
Brittain, J
Beaulieu, C
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] GE Appl Sci Lab West, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.183.2.1830343
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to measure relaxation times in musculoskeletal tissues at 1.5 and 3.0 T to optimize musculoskeletal MRI methods at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In the knees of five healthy volunteers, we measured the T1 and T2 relaxation times of cartilage, synovial fluid, muscle, marrow, and fat at 1.5 and 3.0 T. The T1 relaxation times were measured using a spiral Look-Locker sequence with eight samples along the T1 recovery curve. The T2 relaxation times were measured using a spiral T2 preparation sequence with six echoes. Accuracy and repeatability of the T1 and T2 measurement sequences were verified in phantoms. RESULTS. T1 relaxation times in cartilage, muscle, synovial fluid, marrow, and subcutaneous fat at 3.0 T were consistently higher than those measured at 1.5 T. Measured T2 relaxation times were reduced at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T. Relaxation time measurements in vivo were verified using calculated and measured signal-to-noise results. Relaxation times were used to develop a high-resolution protocol for T2-weighted imaging of the knee at 3.0 T. CONCLUSION. MRI at 3.0 T can improve resolution and speed in musculoskeletal imaging; however, interactions between field strength and relaxation times need to be considered for optimal image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Scanning can be performed in shorter times at 3.0 T using single-average acquisitions. Efficient higher-resolution imaging at 3.0 T can be done by increasing the TR to account for increased T1 relaxation times and acquiring thinner slices than at 1.5 T.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 351
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] BOTTOMLEY PA, 1984, MED PHYS, V11, P425, DOI 10.1118/1.595535
  • [2] CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY WITH MAGNETIZATION-PREPARED T-2 CONTRAST
    BRITTAIN, JH
    HU, BS
    WRIGHT, GA
    MEYER, CH
    MACOVSKI, A
    NISHIMURA, DG
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (05) : 689 - 696
  • [3] Estimation of heat transfer and temperature rise in partial-body regions during MR procedures: An analytical approach with respect to safety considerations
    Brix, G
    Seebass, M
    Hellwig, G
    Griebel, R
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 20 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [4] Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of "90°" RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil
    Collins, CM
    Smith, MB
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (04) : 684 - 691
  • [5] MUSCULOSKELETAL MR-IMAGING AT 4 T AND AT 1.5 T - COMPARISON OF RELAXATION-TIMES AND IMAGE-CONTRAST
    DUEWELL, SH
    CECKLER, TL
    ONG, K
    WEN, H
    JAFFER, FA
    CHESNICK, SA
    BALABAN, RS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) : 551 - 555
  • [6] Dunn JF, 1999, MUSCLE NERVE, V22, P1367, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199910)22:10<1367::AID-MUS5>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-H
  • [8] RELATIVE INTENSITY OF ABDOMINAL ORGANS IN MR IMAGES
    EHMAN, RL
    KJOS, BO
    HRICAK, H
    BRASCH, RC
    HIGGINS, CB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (02) : 315 - 319
  • [9] Trabecular bone volume fraction mapping by low-resolution MRI
    Fernández-Seara, MA
    Song, HK
    Wehrli, FW
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (01) : 103 - 113
  • [10] Optimized spiral imaging for measurement of myocardial T2 relaxation
    Foltz, WD
    Al-Kwifi, O
    Sussman, MS
    Stainsby, JA
    Wright, GA
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (06) : 1089 - 1097