Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients

被引:158
作者
Tilden, VP
Tolle, SW
Nelson, CA
Fields, J
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Eth Hlth Care, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
end-of-life decision-making; family stress; treatment withdrawal;
D O I
10.1097/00006199-200103000-00006
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: With a national trend toward less aggressive treatment of hospitalized terminally ill patients, families increasingly participate in decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Although prior research indicates decision making is stressful for families, there have been no psychometric reports of actual stress levels and few discussions of the reasoning used by families compared to clinicians in reaching the decision. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess levels of family stress associated with decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, to assess factors that affected stress, and to compare families and clinicians on their reasoning about the decision. Methods: Data were collected from hospital decedent charts, family members of decedents, and clinicians who cared for decedents. Data from families were collected in individual interviews, shortly after decedent death and 6 months later, using psychometric measures and semi-structured interview questions. Clinicians were interviewed once shortly following patient death. Results: Family stress associated with the withdraw decision was high immediately following the death of the decedent and, while it decreased over time, remained high a half a year later. Several factors affected stress; most notably, stress was highest in the absence of patient advance directives. In reaching the decision, both families and clinicians prioritized what the patient would want, although families, more strongly than clinicians, endorsed doing everything medically possible to prolong the patient's life. Conclusions: Findings add compelling evidence for the power of advance directives, whether written or verbal, to reduce the stress associated with family decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 115
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]  
SWIGART V, 1995, J CLIN ETHIC, V6, P85
[42]   Letting go: Family willingness to forgo life support [J].
Swigart, V ;
Lidz, C ;
Butterworth, V ;
Arnold, R .
HEART & LUNG, 1996, 25 (06) :483-494
[43]   ABOUT LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT - IMPACT OF PHYSICIANS BEHAVIORS ON THE FAMILY [J].
TILDEN, VP ;
TOLLE, SW ;
GARLAND, MJ ;
NELSON, CA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (06) :633-638
[44]  
TILDEN VP, 1999, J FAM NURS, V4, P426
[45]  
TITLER MG, 1991, HEART LUNG, V20, P174
[46]   Family reports of barriers to optimal care of the dying [J].
Tolle, SW ;
Tilden, VP ;
Rosenfeld, AG ;
Hickman, SE .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (06) :310-317
[47]   Oregon's low in-hospital death rates: What determines where people die and satisfaction with decisions on place of death? [J].
Tolle, SW ;
Rosenfeld, AG ;
Tilden, VP ;
Park, Y .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 130 (08) :681-685
[48]   THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4481) :453-458
[49]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483