Methods for the isolation and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes:: a review

被引:260
作者
Gasanov, U
Hughes, D
Hansbro, PM
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Hunter Med Res Inst, Vaccines Immunol Infect Viruses & Asthma Grp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] DH MICRO Consulting, Peelwood, NSW 2583, Australia
关键词
listeria; isolation; identification; food; environment; epidemiology; culture; serology; molecular; phenotyping;
D O I
10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.002
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Listeria monocytogenes is an important food-borne pathogen and is widely tested for in food, environmental and clinical samples. Identification traditionally involved culture methods based on selective enrichment and plating followed by the characterization of Listeria spp. based on colony morphology, sugar fermentation and haemolytic properties. These methods are the gold standard; but they are lengthy and may not be suitable for testing of foods with short shelf lives. As a result more rapid tests were developed based on antibodies (ELISA) or molecular techniques (PCR or DNA hybridization). While these tests possess equal sensitivity, they are rapid and allow testing to be completed within 48 It. More recently, molecular methods were developed that target RNA rather than DNA, such as RT-PCR, real time PCR or nucleic acid based sequence amplification (NASBA). These tests not only provide a measure of cell viability but they can also be used for quantitative analysis. In addition, a variety of tests are available for sub-species characterization, which are particularly useful in epidemiological investigations. Early typing methods differentiated isolates based on phenotypic markers, such as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, phage typing and serotyping. These phenotypic typing methods are being replaced by molecular tests, which reflect genetic relationships between isolates and are more accurate. These new methods are currently mainly used in research but their considerable potential for routine testing in the future cannot be overlooked. (c) 2005 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 875
页数:25
相关论文
共 290 条
  • [11] AUDURIER A, 1984, CLIN INVEST MED, V7, P229
  • [12] AUDURIER A, 1979, ANN INST PASTEUR MIC, VB130, P179
  • [13] Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis typing of New Zealand Listeria monocytogenes isolates
    Avery, SM
    Hudson, JA
    Buncic, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 28 (03) : 351 - 359
  • [14] PCR detection of Listeria monocytogenes:: a study of multiple factors affecting sensitivity
    Aznar, R
    Alarcón, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 95 (05) : 958 - 966
  • [15] Aznar R, 2002, SYST APPL MICROBIOL, V25, P109, DOI 10.1078/0723202022528889
  • [16] Evaluation of an extended diagnostic PCR assay for detection and verification of the common causes of bacterial meningitis in CSF and other biological samples
    Bäckman, A
    Lantz, PG
    Rådström, P
    Olcén, P
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1999, 13 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [17] Comparison of sodium hypochlorite-based foam and peroxyacetic acid-based fog sanitizing procedures in a salmon smokehouse:: Survival of the general microflora and Listeria monocytogenes
    Bagge-Ravin, D
    Gardshodn, K
    Gram, L
    Vogel, BF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2003, 66 (04) : 592 - 598
  • [18] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN STRAINS OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES FROM EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEYS
    BALOGA, AO
    HARLANDER, SK
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 57 (08) : 2324 - 2331
  • [19] Typing of Listeria monocytogenes by monocin and phage receptors
    Bannerman, E
    Boerlin, P
    Bille, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 31 (1-3) : 245 - 262
  • [20] Multiplex PCR assay for the routine detection of Listeria in food
    Bansal, NS
    McDonell, FHY
    Smith, A
    Arnold, G
    Ibrahim, GF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 33 (2-3) : 293 - 300