QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment

被引:794
作者
Benkert, Pascal [1 ]
Tosatto, Silvio C. E. [2 ,3 ]
Schomburg, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Inst Biochem, D-50674 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Biol, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, CRIBI Biotechnol Ctr, I-35121 Padua, Italy
关键词
protein structure prediction; model quality assessment; comparative modeling; fold recognition; statistical potentials; torsion angle potential; scoring function; energy function;
D O I
10.1002/prot.21715
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In protein structure prediction, a considerable number of alternative models are usually produced from which subsequently the final model has to be selected. Thus, a scoring function for the identification of the best model within an ensemble of alternative models is a key component of most protein structure prediction pipelines. QMEAN, which stands for Qualitative Model Energy ANalysis, is a composite scoring function describing the major geometrical aspects of protein structures. Five different structural descriptors are used. The local geometry is analyzed by a new kind of torsion angle potential over three consecutive amino acids. A secondary structure-specific distance-dependent pairwise residue-level potential is used to assess long-range interactions. A solvation potential describes the burial status of the residues. Two simple terms describing the agreement of predicted and calculated secondary structure and solvent accessibility, respectively, are also included. A variety of different implementations are investigated and several approaches to combine and optimize them are discussed. QMEAN was tested on several standard decoy sets including a molecular dynamics simulation decoy set as well as on a comprehensive data set of totally 22,420 models from server predictions for the 95 targets of CASP7. In a comparison to five well-established model quality assessment programs, QMEAN shows a statistically significant improvement over nearly all quality measures describing the ability of the scoring function to identify the native structure and to discriminate good from bad models. The three-residue torsion angle potential turned out to be very effective in recognizing the native fold.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 277
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]   Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures [J].
Shen, Min-Yi ;
Sali, Andrej .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (11) :2507-2524
[52]   Propensities, probabilities, and the Boltzmann hypothesis [J].
Shortle, D .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (06) :1298-1302
[53]   Composites of local structure propensities: Evidence for local encoding of long-range structure [J].
Shortle, D .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (01) :18-26
[54]   CALCULATION OF CONFORMATIONAL ENSEMBLES FROM POTENTIALS OF MEAN FORCE - AN APPROACH TO THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED PREDICTION OF LOCAL STRUCTURES IN GLOBULAR-PROTEINS [J].
SIPPL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 213 (04) :859-883
[55]   DETECTION OF NATIVE-LIKE MODELS FOR AMINO-ACID-SEQUENCES OF UNKNOWN 3-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE IN A DATA-BASE OF KNOWN PROTEIN CONFORMATIONS [J].
SIPPL, MJ ;
WEITCKUS, S .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1992, 13 (03) :258-271
[56]   BOLTZMANN PRINCIPLE, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MEAN FIELDS AND PROTEIN-FOLDING - AN APPROACH TO THE COMPUTATIONAL DETERMINATION OF PROTEIN STRUCTURES [J].
SIPPL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1993, 7 (04) :473-501
[57]  
Skolnick J, 2000, PROTEINS, V38, P3, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000101)38:1<3::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO
[58]  
2-S
[59]   Improving the quality of protein structure models by selecting from alignment alternatives [J].
Sommer, Ingolf ;
Toppo, Stefano ;
Sander, Oliver ;
Lengauer, Thomas ;
Tosatto, Silvio C. E. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 7 (1)
[60]   Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? [J].
Thomas, PD ;
Dill, KA .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 257 (02) :457-469