Method for automated cartilage histomorphometry

被引:43
作者
O'Driscoll, SW
Marx, RG
Fitzsimmons, JS
Beaton, DE
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Cartilage & Connect Tissue Res Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
TISSUE ENGINEERING | 1999年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/ten.1999.5.13
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
We have developed and tested a color-based method for automated computerized histomorphometric analysis of cartilage. Histological sections stained with safranin O from 29 rabbit periosteal agarose-cultured explants were selected with various amounts of cartilage (0-100%). color photomicrographs of these sections were visually assessed by five expert observers who estimated the percent area occupied by cartilage and outlined tin pen) the areas they considered to be cartilage. Manual histomorphometry was performed by cutting out and weighing the outlined areas. The average area for each of the five observers ranged from 31% to 43% (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70). The average of these values was used as a "gold standard" against which to compare the computer measurements. When point counting histomorphometry was performed on the 29 sections, the data agreed with the measurements made by the other five cartilage experts (r(2) = 0.96; p < 0.0001). The analysis of cartilage is based on safranin O stain, using a custom-designed Vidas 2.1 Image Analysis Program (Zeiss). The computer-based results correlated very closely with those obtained by manual (p = 0.0001; r(2) = 0.92) and point counting (r(2) = 0.92; p < 0.0001) histomorphometry. The mean percentage of the sections occupied by cartilage measured in the automated mode was only 6% higher than that using the gold standard. Histological complexity had only a minor effect on the computerized values. The automated computerized image analysis system has the advantages of objectivity, accuracy, repeatability, and ease of use.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 23
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ANDERSON JM, 1982, THEORY PRACTICE HIST, P548
[2]   INTERMETHOD VARIATION IN BONE HISTOMORPHOMETRY - COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUAL AND COMPUTERIZED METHODS APPLIED TO ILIAC BONE BIOPSIES [J].
CHAVASSIEUX, PM ;
ARLOT, ME ;
MEUNIER, PJ .
BONE, 1985, 6 (04) :221-229
[3]   INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIATION IN BONE HISTOMORPHOMETRY [J].
COMPSTON, JE ;
VEDI, S ;
STELLON, AJ .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1986, 38 (02) :67-70
[4]  
DELANEY JP, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P278
[5]  
Fleiss JL., 1986, The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments, P7
[6]   RELATIONSHIP OF DONOR SITE TO CHONDROGENIC POTENTIAL OF PERIOSTEUM IN-VITRO [J].
GALLAY, SH ;
MIURA, Y ;
COMMISSO, CN ;
FITZSIMMONS, JS ;
ODRISCOLL, SW .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1994, 12 (04) :515-525
[7]   A methodology for the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage histomorphometry [J].
Hacker, SA ;
Healey, RM ;
Yoshioka, M ;
Coutts, RD .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1997, 5 (05) :343-355
[8]   AN AUTOMATIC METHOD FOR BONE HISTOMORPHOMETRY - ASSESSMENT WITH REFERENCE TO USUAL STATIC AND DYNAMIC PARAMETERS [J].
JUVIN, R ;
CAMUS, E ;
USSON, Y ;
PHELIP, X .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1990, 5 (03) :235-244
[9]   BIOCHEMICAL AND METABOLIC ABNORMALITIES IN ARTICULAR CARTILAGE FROM OSTEO-ARTHRITIC HUMAN HIPS .2. CORRELATION OF MORPHOLOGY WITH BIOCHEMICAL AND METABOLIC DATA [J].
MANKIN, HJ ;
DORFMAN, H ;
LIPPIELL.L ;
ZARINS, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1971, A 53 (03) :523-+
[10]  
MIURA Y, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P271