Central motor conduction differs between acute relapsing-remitting and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis

被引:27
作者
Humm, AM
Magistris, MR
Truffert, A
Hess, CW
Rösler, KM
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Dept Neurol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Dept Neurol, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
central motor conduction time; central motor conduction failure; transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor evoked potentials;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00231-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To characterize central motor conduction in relation to the clinical deficits and to the disease duration in 90 patients with acute relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) and in 51 patients with chronic primary or secondary progressive MS (P-MS). Methods: The triple stimulation technique (TST) was used to quantity the central motor conduction failure (expressed by the TST amplitude ratio) and conventional motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were used to measure the central motor conduction time (CMCT). Results: The TST amplitude ratio was reduced in presence of a clinical motor deficit (p = 0.02 for RR-NIS, p < 0.01 for P-MS), but did not significantly differ in RR-MS and P-MS (p > 0.05) when patients with similar clinical motor deficit were compared. The CMCT was not related to the clinical motor deficit in both RR-MS and P-MS. However, the CMCT was markedly prolonged in P-MS, when patients with similar clinical motor deficit and with similar disease duration were compared (p < 0.01). The differences were not attributable to differential involvement of the spinal cord, which was similar in RR-NIS and P-MS. Conclusions: Our results disclose differences between the central motor conduction in RR-NIS and P-MS that are not related to disease severity, spinal cord involvement or disease duration. (C) 2003 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2196 / 2203
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[2]   DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF PARACLINICAL TESTS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES AND SPECIFICITIES FOR RECLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO THE POSER COMMITTEE CRITERIA [J].
BEER, S ;
ROSLER, KM ;
HESS, CW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 59 (02) :152-159
[3]  
BENECKE R, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, P333
[4]  
BERARDELLI A, 1991, EXP BRAIN RES, V87, P402
[5]   The triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs [J].
Bühler, R ;
Magistris, MR ;
Truffert, A ;
Hess, CW ;
Rösler, KM .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (05) :938-949
[6]   Motor evoked potentials and disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [J].
Facchetti, D ;
Mai, R ;
Micheli, A ;
Marciano, N ;
Capra, R ;
Gasparotti, R ;
Poloni, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 24 (04) :332-337
[7]  
Felts PA, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P7267
[8]   Evoked potentials for evaluation of multiple sclerosis [J].
Fuhr, P ;
Kappos, L .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (12) :2185-2189
[9]   Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis [J].
Fuhr, P ;
Borggrefe-Chappuis, A ;
Schindler, C ;
Kappos, L .
BRAIN, 2001, 124 :2162-2168
[10]   MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION - CENTRAL MOTOR CONDUCTION STUDIES IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
HESS, CW ;
MILLS, KR ;
MURRAY, NMF ;
SCHRIEFER, TN .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1987, 22 (06) :744-752