Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: Data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice

被引:266
作者
Hibbard, JH [1 ]
Peters, E
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Planning Publ Policy & Management, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Decis Res, Eugene, OR 97401 USA
[3] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
consumer health information; health care choices; decision-making;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.141005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
To make informed choices and navigate within a complex health care system, consumers must have easily available, accurate, and timely information, and they must use it. Contrary to the consumer-driven approach, however, the evidence demonstrates that having an abundance of information does not always translate into its being used to inform choices. The challenge is not merely to communicate accurate information to consumers, but to understand how to present and target that information so that it is actually used in decision-making. This paper reviews what is known from studies of human judgment and decision-making and discusses their implications for supporting informed consumer choice. We delineate the types of decisions that consumers and patients are making, the barriers to using information effectively in choice, and draw upon the evidence for the efficacy of different presentation strategies to propose an initial framework for evaluating and choosing comparative information presentation approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 433
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   Narrative valuation in a policy judgment context [J].
Satterfield, T ;
Slovic, P ;
Gregory, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 34 (03) :315-331
[42]   Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care [J].
Schapira, MM ;
Nattinger, AB ;
McHorney, CA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (06) :459-467
[43]   THE ROLE OF VIVID INFORMATION IN FEAR APPEALS AND ATTITUDE-CHANGE [J].
SHERER, M ;
ROGERS, RW .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1984, 18 (03) :321-334
[44]   The empirical case for two systems of reasoning [J].
Sloman, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :3-22
[45]   Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats [J].
Slovic, P ;
Monahan, J ;
MacGregor, DG .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2000, 24 (03) :271-296
[46]   THE CONSTRUCTION OF PREFERENCE [J].
SLOVIC, P .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 50 (05) :364-371
[47]  
Slovic P., 2002, HEURISTICS BIASES PS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.025
[48]  
SLOVIC VHA, 2000, CONSUMER DEMAND CLIN
[49]   How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures [J].
Strange, JJ ;
Leung, CC .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (04) :436-449
[50]   CONTINGENT WEIGHTING IN JUDGMENT AND CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
SATTATH, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (03) :371-384