Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel X-ray detector Contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy

被引:42
作者
Chotas, HG [1 ]
Ravin, CE [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Thorac Imaging Res Div, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
experimental study; lung; radiography; digital; flat panel; thorax;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr27679
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare human observer performance in a contrast-detail test by using postprocessed hard-copy images from a digital chest radiography system and conventional screen-film radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The digital radiography system is based on a large- area flat-panel x-ray detector with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Images of a contrast-detail phantom were acquired at two exposure levels by using two standard thoracic screen-film systems and the digital system at matched dose. By using images of the phantom processed with standard chest image postprocessing techniques, a four-alternative forced-choice observer perception study was performed, and the number of detectable test signals (disk-shaped objects 0.3-4.0 mm in diameter) was determined for each image type. RESULTS: On average, observers detected more test signals on digital images than on screen-film radiographs at all diameters up to 2.0 mm and an equivalent number at larger diameters. Test signals with lower inherent subject contrast were detected more readily on digital images than on screen-film images, even when x-ray exposure levels for the digital system were reduced by 20%. CONCLUSION: Observer performance in a contrast-detail detection task can be improved by using images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired with state-of-the-art screen-film combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 682
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1349-1358
[2]  
BUNCH PC, 1992, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1653, P46, DOI 10.1117/12.59484
[3]  
BURT P, 1983, IEEE T COMMUN, V31, P540
[4]   DQE(F) OF 4 GENERATIONS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY ACQUISITION DEVICES [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
ERGUN, DL ;
RUTZ, L ;
HINSHAW, DA ;
BLUME, H ;
CLARK, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1581-1593
[5]   Performance characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat panel X-ray imaging detector [J].
Granfors, PR .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 :480-490
[6]   IMAGE QUALITY OF A DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM BASED ON A SELENIUM DETECTOR [J].
NEITZEL, U ;
MAACK, I ;
GUNTHERKOHFAHL, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :509-516
[7]  
VUYLSTEKE P, 1997, P 1997 AAPM SUMM SCH