Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography

被引:80
作者
Aufrichtig, R [1 ]
机构
[1] GE Med Syst, Xray Detector Engn, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
关键词
digital chest radiography; amorphous silicon; detective quantum efficiency; observer modeling;
D O I
10.1118/1.598630
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Low contrast threshold detectability is investigated theoretically and experimentally for an amorphous silicon (a-Si) x-ray detector designed for digital radiography and for a standard thoracic screen-film combination. A theoretical signal-to-noise ratio is described with a human observer signal detection model. It is calculated using the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) and the modulation transfer function of the imaging system, as well as a spatial response function for the human visual system. Using a four-alternative forced choice observer perception study, the threshold contrasts of disk shaped objects ranging in size from 0.3 to 4.0 mm are determined. Significantly better contrast detectability is obtained from the digital detector, which is attributed to its higher DQE. On average, the disk shaped objects can be detected at 45% less contrast than required for screen-him. With no free parameters the experimental data agree well with those predicted by the observer model. Based upon the data, the model predicts that x-ray exposure for the a-Si detector only needs to be 30% of the exposure required to perform equally well on the contrast-detail detectability task using screen-film. (C) 1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405 (99)01507-2].
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1358
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   A FULLY AUTOMATED ADAPTIVE UNSHARP MASKING TECHNIQUE IN DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPH [J].
ABE, K ;
KATSURAGAWA, S ;
SASAKI, Y ;
YANAGISAWA, T .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (01) :64-70
[2]   PERCEPTUAL COMPARISON OF PULSED AND CONTINUOUS FLUOROSCOPY [J].
AUFRICHTIG, R ;
XUE, P ;
THOMAS, CW ;
GILMORE, GC ;
WILSON, DL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (02) :245-256
[3]   MODEL FOR PERCEPTION OF PULSED FLUOROSCOPY IMAGE SEQUENCES [J].
AUFRICHTIG, R ;
THOMAS, CW ;
XUE, P ;
WILSON, DL .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1994, 11 (12) :3167-3176
[4]   Improved Bayesian image estimation for digital chest radiography [J].
Baydush, AH ;
Bowsher, JE ;
Laading, JK ;
Floyd, CE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (04) :539-545
[5]   BLURRED-MASK DENSITY COMPRESSION FOR IMPROVED REPRODUCTION OF RADIOGRAPHS [J].
BEDNAREK, DR ;
RUDIN, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (04) :358-363
[6]  
BUNCH PC, 1992, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1653, P46, DOI 10.1117/12.59484
[7]   EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN VISUAL SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
WAGNER, RF ;
JENNINGS, RJ ;
BARLOW, HB .
SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4516) :93-94
[8]   COMPARISON OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC AND FORCED-CHOICE OBSERVER PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT METHODS [J].
BURGESS, AE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (05) :643-655
[9]   THRESHOLD PERCEPTION PERFORMANCE WITH COMPUTED AND SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR CHEST RADIOGRAPHY [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
RICE, JJ ;
BEAM, CA ;
RAVIN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :179-187
[10]   DQE(F) OF 4 GENERATIONS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY ACQUISITION DEVICES [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
ERGUN, DL ;
RUTZ, L ;
HINSHAW, DA ;
BLUME, H ;
CLARK, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1581-1593