MODEL FOR PERCEPTION OF PULSED FLUOROSCOPY IMAGE SEQUENCES

被引:32
作者
AUFRICHTIG, R
THOMAS, CW
XUE, P
WILSON, DL
机构
[1] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT RADIOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
来源
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION | 1994年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.11.003167
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Pulsed fluoroscopy at reduced frame rates can be used to lower x-ray dose with equivalent detection (hereafter called equivalent perception) of low-contrast, stationary objects. Experimentally average dose savings of 22%, 38%, and 49%, for pulsed fluoroscopy at 15, 10, and 7.5 acquisitions per second, respectively, are documented. Dose savings depend on object size, with fewer savings for smaller objects. To explain these data, we extend the framework of an ideal observer with three models for the spatiotemporal response of the human visual They are model 1, separable; model 2, nonseparable; and model 3, nonseparable with internal With no free parameters, model 1 predicts the average dose savings within a 3% difference but does not describe the effect of object size. Models 2 and 3 explain the influence of size, and model 3, with a single free parameter, fits the measurements best. Perception of pulsed fluoroscopy is thus well described in terms of spatiotemporal processing by the HVS.
引用
收藏
页码:3167 / 3176
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   PERCEPTUAL COMPARISON OF PULSED AND CONTINUOUS FLUOROSCOPY [J].
AUFRICHTIG, R ;
XUE, P ;
THOMAS, CW ;
GILMORE, GC ;
WILSON, DL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (02) :245-256
[2]  
AUFRICHTIG R, 1992, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1653, P374, DOI 10.1117/12.59515
[3]  
AUFRICHTIG R, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V185, P305
[4]   TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SUMMATION IN HUMAN VISION AT DIFFERENT BACKGROUND INTENSITIES [J].
BARLOW, HB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1958, 141 (02) :337-350
[5]  
BERTHELSEN B, 1991, ACTA RADIOL, V32, P492
[6]   SPATIOTEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VISUAL MECHANISMS - EXCITATORY-INHIBITORY MODEL [J].
BURBECK, CA ;
KELLY, DH .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 70 (09) :1121-1126
[7]   EFFECT OF QUANTIZATION NOISE ON VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION IN NOISY IMAGES [J].
BURGESS, A .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (09) :1424-1428
[8]   EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN VISUAL SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
WAGNER, RF ;
JENNINGS, RJ ;
BARLOW, HB .
SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4516) :93-94
[9]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .4. OBSERVER INCONSISTENCY [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
COLBORNE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (04) :617-627
[10]  
BURGESS AE, 1990, VISION CODING EFFICI, P431