Precision error of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans at spine, hip, and forearm

被引:53
作者
Henzell, S
Dhaliwal, S
Pontifex, R
Gill, F
Price, R
Retallack, R
Prince, R
机构
[1] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Med Technol & Phys, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Dept Med, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
dual X-ray absorptiometry; precision; Hologic; fan beam; compare;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:3:4:359
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The current study investigated short-term precision of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans using a sample of subjects typically seen in a routine practice. Seventy-two women were scanned twice each in array fan-beam mode at the lumbar spine and 71 at the hip on a Hologic QDR 2000. Sixty-five were scanned at the forearm on a Hologic QDR 4500A in array mode. Each of the two scans was analyzed without reference to its companion scan (independent analysis). The second assessment was also reanalyzed using the manufacturer's "Compare" function (compared analysis). Coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated for the two forms of analysis at all the sites measured. Paired t-tests were performed to see whether the Compare function improved precision. The CV at the lumbar spine was 1.1% in both forms of analysis. The Compare function did not improve precision significantly at this site. The highest precision at the hip was found at the "Total'' site of the hip (1.2-1.0%, independent and compared analyses, respectively) and the lowest at Ward's triangle (3.2-2.8%). The Compare function significantly improved precision at Ward's triangle. The forearm had the best precision of all the sites measured, with the Total site of the forearm highest (0.5-0.7%) and the ultra-distal sire lowest (1.6-1.8%). The Compare function significantly decreased precision at the middistal and Total sites of the forearm. In conclusion. the highest precision was found at the Total site of the hip, the Total site of the forearm, and the spine. The Compare function did not significantly improve precision at the spine or hip (with the exception of Ward's triangle) and decreased precision at the forearm.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 364
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
*BRIT STAND I, 1979, PRECISION TEST METHO
[3]  
Duboeuf F, 1991, Osteoporos Int, V1, P242
[4]  
EL-HAJJ FULEIHAN G, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P1004
[5]   FACTORS INFLUENCING SHORT-TERM PRECISION OF DUAL X-RAY BONE ABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA) OF SPINE AND FEMUR [J].
ENGELKE, K ;
GLUER, CC ;
GENANT, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 56 (01) :19-25
[6]  
GUTTERIDGE D H, 1990, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, V5, pS205
[7]   Measurement of forearm bone mineral density:: Comparison of precision of five different instruments [J].
Heilmann, P ;
Wüster, C ;
Prolingheuer, C ;
Götz, M ;
Ziegler, R .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 62 (05) :383-387
[8]   PRECISION AND STABILITY OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS [J].
JOHNSON, J ;
DAWSONHUGHES, B .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 49 (03) :174-178
[9]   HUMAN LACTATION - FOREARM TRABECULAR BONE LOSS, INCREASED BONE TURNOVER, AND RENAL CONSERVATION OF CALCIUM AND INORGANIC-PHOSPHATE WITH RECOVERY OF BONE MASS FOLLOWING WEANING [J].
KENT, GN ;
PRICE, RI ;
GUTTERIDGE, DH ;
SMITH, M ;
ALLEN, JR ;
BHAGAT, CI ;
BARNES, MP ;
HICKLING, CJ ;
RETALLACK, RW ;
WILSON, SG ;
DEVLIN, RD ;
DAVIES, C ;
STJOHN, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1990, 5 (04) :361-369
[10]   PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
MAZESS, R ;
COLLICK, B ;
TREMPE, J ;
BARDEN, H ;
HANSON, J .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (03) :228-232