GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks

被引:253
作者
Dieu Tien Bui [1 ]
Tien-Chung Ho [2 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [3 ,7 ]
Binh-Thai Pham [4 ]
Viet-Ha Nhu [5 ]
Revhaug, Inge [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Southeast Norway, Dept Business Adm & Comp Sci, Geog Informat Syst Grp, N-3800 Bo I Telemark, Norway
[2] Vietnam Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Dept Tecton & Geomorphol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Civil Engn, GISRC, Fac Engn, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Gujarat Technol Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Nr Visat Three Rd, Ahmadabad 382424, Gujarat, India
[5] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Dept Geol Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam
[6] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Math Sci & Technol, POB 5003 IMT, N-1432 As, Norway
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Geoinformat Engn, 209 Neungdong Ro Gwangjingu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
关键词
Landslide; GIS; Functional trees; AdaBoost; MultiBoost; Bagging; Vietnam; HOA BINH PROVINCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; YIHUANG AREA CHINA; SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; DECISION TREE; FEATURE-SELECTION; RANDOM FORESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-016-5919-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to propose and verify a novel ensemble methodology that could improve prediction performances of landslide susceptibility models. The proposed methodology is based on the functional tree classifier and three current state-of-the art machine learning ensemble frameworks, Bagging, AdaBoost, and MultiBoost. According to current literature, these methods have been rarely used for the modeling of rainfall-induced landslides. The corridor of the National Road 32 (Vietnam) was selected as a case study. In the first stage, the landslide inventory map with 262 landslide polygons that occurred during the last 20 years was constructed and then was randomly partitioned into a ratio of 70/30 for training and validating the models. Second, ten landslide conditioning factors were prepared such as slope, aspect, relief amplitude, topographic wetness index, topographic shape, distance to roads, distance to rivers, distance to faults, lithology, and rainfall. The model performance was assessed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic and statistical evaluation measures. Overall, the FT with Bagging model has the highest prediction capability (AUC = 0.917), followed by the FT with MultiBoost model (AUC = 0.910), the FT model (AUC = 0.898), and the FT with AdaBoost model (AUC = 0.882). Compared with those derived from popular methods such as J48 decision trees and artificial neural networks, the performance of the FT with Bagging model is better. Therefore, it can be concluded that the FT with Bagging is promising and could be used as an alternative in landslide susceptibility assessment. The result in this study is useful for land use planning and decision making in landslide prone areas.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] Fit-for-Purpose: Species Distribution Model Performance Depends on Evaluation Criteria - Dutch Hoverflies as a Case Study
    Aguirre-Gutierrez, Jesus
    Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
    Polce, Chiara
    van Loon, E. Emiel
    Raes, Niels
    Reemer, Menno
    Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [2] A novel ensemble decision tree-based CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) and multivariate logistic regression models in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Althuwaynee, Omar F.
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Park, Hyuck-Jin
    Lee, Jung Hyun
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2014, 11 (06) : 1063 - 1078
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, ADV KNOWLEDGE DISCOV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, P 34 INT ACM SIGIR C
  • [5] [Anonymous], P IEMSS 6 BIENN M IN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT02802, 10.1002/9781118445112.stat02802]
  • [7] The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan
    Ayalew, L
    Yamagishi, H
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2005, 65 (1-2) : 15 - 31
  • [8] Beven K.J., 1979, Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, V24, P43, DOI DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834
  • [9] Bian S, 2006, IEEE IJCNN, P3078
  • [10] A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)
    Binh Thai Pham
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Bui, Dieu Tien
    Prakash, Indra
    Dholakia, M. B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 84 : 240 - 250