Understanding and managing compliance in the nature conservation context

被引:129
作者
Arias, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Australian Res Council Ctr Excellence Coral Reef, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Enforcement; Conservation; Illegal resource use; Poaching; Natural resource management; Behaviour; GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; LAW-ENFORCEMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; LUANGWA-VALLEY; ILLEGAL EXPLOITATION; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; FISHERIES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nature conservation relies largely on peoples' rule adherence. However, noncompliance in the conservation context is common: it is one of the largest illegal activities in the world, degrading societies, economies and the environment Understanding and managing compliance is key for ensuring effective conservation, nevertheless crucial concepts and tools are scattered in a wide array of literature. Here I review and integrate these concepts and tools in an effort to guide compliance management in the conservation context. First, I address the understanding of compliance by breaking it down into five key questions: who?, what?, when?, where? and why?. A special focus is given to 'why?' because the answer to this question explains the reasons for compliance and noncompliance, providing critical information for management interventions. Second, I review compliance management strategies, from voluntary compliance to coerced compliance. Finally, I suggest a system, initially proposed for tax compliance, to balance these multiple compliance management strategies. This paper differs from others by providing a broad yet practical scope on theory and tools for understanding and managing compliance in the nature conservation context (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 143
页数:10
相关论文
共 117 条
[41]   The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments [J].
Ferraro, PJ ;
Simpson, RD .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (03) :339-353
[42]  
Fishbein M., 1992, INFLUENCING HUMAN BE
[43]  
Fishbein M, 2011, PREDICTING AND CHANGING BEHAVIOR: THE REASONED ACTION APPROACH, P1
[44]  
Frey BrunoS., 1999, Journal of Consumer Policy, V22, P395, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1006256117094
[45]   Motivation crowding theory [J].
Frey, BS ;
Jegen, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2001, 15 (05) :589-611
[46]   Measuring and Monitoring Illegal Use of Natural Resources [J].
Gavin, Michael C. ;
Solomon, Jennifer N. ;
Blank, Sara G. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) :89-100
[47]  
GBRMPA, 2014, EYES EARS INC REP
[48]   Co-management policy can reduce resilience in traditionally managed marine ecosystems [J].
Gelcich, Stefan ;
Edwards-Jones, Gareth ;
Kaiser, Michel J. ;
Castilla, Juan C. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2006, 9 (06) :951-966
[49]  
Gettleman J., 2015, NY TIMES
[50]   Introducing Conservation Criminology [J].
Gibbs, Carole ;
Gore, Meredith L. ;
McGarrell, Edmund F. ;
Rivers, Louie, III .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 50 (01) :124-144