The biomechanical analysis of a tendon fixation device for flexor tendon repair

被引:24
作者
Su, BW
Protopsaltis, TS
Koff, MF
Chang, KP
Strauch, RJ
Crow, SA
Rosenwasser, MP
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Trauma Training Ctr, New York Orthopaed Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2005年 / 30A卷 / 02期
关键词
flexor tendon repair; tendon biomechanics; stainless steel;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.020
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Stainless steel suture is high in tensile strength but is not widely used in flexor tendon repair because of difficulty with handling and knot tying. The purpose of this study was to examine the biomechanical characteristics of the single-strand multifilament stainless steel Teno Fix device (Ortheon Medical, Winter Park, FL) designed for zone 11 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon repair. Methods: Sixty cadaveric flexor tendons were transected and randomized to receive a Teno Fix or 4-stranded (3-0 or 4-0 braided polyester) suture repair; all repairs were tested with and without a 5-0 monofilament polypropylene circumferential epitendinous suture. By using a material testing system all tendons were tested to failure in tension using a linear model with a loading rate of 1 mm/s. Stiffness, force, and energy at both 2-mm gap and peak force were calculated from the resulting force-displacement curves. Results: The 2-mm gapping force was significantly greater for the Teno Fix and the 3-0 repairs than for the 4-0 repairs. The energy absorbed up to 2-mm gap was significantly greater for the Teno Fix, however, than for all suture repairs both with and without a circumferential suture. There was no statistically significant difference in peak force or energy absorbed at peak force between the Teno Fix and suture repairs; the average gap at peak force for all repairs was 5.2 mm. The addition of a circumferential suture increased the 2-mm gapping and peak forces of the Teno Fix repair to 54.5 N and 66.7 N, respectively. Conclusions: Increased strength and energy absorbed at 2-mm gap and ease of installation makes the Teno Fix a promising repair method. Copyright (c) 2005 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
Comparative biomechanical performances of 4-strand core suture repairs for zone II flexor tendon lacerations [J].
Angeles, JG ;
Heminger, H ;
Mass, DP .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 27A (03) :508-517
[2]
A COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE MOBILIZATION OF FLEXOR TENDON REPAIRS WITH PASSIVE FLEXION-ACTIVE EXTENSION AND CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOTION TECHNIQUES [J].
BAINBRIDGE, LC ;
ROBERTSON, C ;
GILLIES, D ;
ELLIOT, D .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1994, 19B (04) :517-521
[3]
Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by early active mobilization [J].
Baktir, A ;
Turk, CY ;
Kabak, S ;
Sahin, V ;
Kardas, Y .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1996, 21B (05) :624-628
[4]
Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs [J].
Barrie, KA ;
Tomak, SL ;
Cholewicki, J ;
Merrell, GA ;
Wolfe, SW .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 26A (02) :340-346
[5]
A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model [J].
Barrie, KA ;
Wolfe, SW ;
Shean, C ;
Shenbagamurthi, D ;
Slade, FF ;
Panjabi, MM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (03) :499-506
[6]
Becker H, 1979, J Hand Surg Am, V4, P454
[7]
Boyer Martin I, 2003, Instr Course Lect, V52, P137
[8]
CIESLIK K, 1986, Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie, V18, P347
[9]
FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR IN ZONE-2 FOLLOWED BY CONTROLLED ACTIVE MOBILIZATION [J].
CULLEN, KW ;
TOLHURST, P ;
LANG, D ;
PAGE, RE .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1989, 14B (04) :392-395
[10]
Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs [J].
Diao, E ;
Hariharan, JS ;
Soejima, O ;
Lotz, JC .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (02) :234-239