Accounting recognition of intangible assets: Theory and evidence on economic determinants

被引:113
作者
Wyatt, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
technology; property rights; intangible assets; financial reporting;
D O I
10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.967
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the extent to which management makes accounting choices to record intangible assets based on their insights into the underlying economics of their firm. It exploits a setting in which management has accounting discretion to record a wide range of intangible assets. The results suggest that management's choice to record intangible assets is associated with the strength of the technology affecting the firms operations, the length of the technology cycle time, and property-rights-related factors that affect the firm's ability to appropriate the investment benefits. These effects are more important than other contracting and signaling factors consistent with the underlying economics operating as a first-order effect as envisaged by GAAP. The results also indicate that the intangible assets management has a voluntary (unregulated) choice to record-identifiable intangible assets-are more highly correlated with underlying economic factors than the regulated classes, purchased goodwill and R&D assets. This result suggests that limiting managements' choices to record intangible assets tends to reduce, rather than improve, the quality of the balance sheet and investors' information set.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 1003
页数:37
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization [J].
Aboody, D ;
Lev, B .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1998, 36 :161-191
[2]   Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Audretsch, DB .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 49 (01) :21-43
[3]  
ANDERSON D, 1992, ACCOUNTING FINAN NOV, P27
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, US PAT DAT SCI TECHN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, EC INTANGIBLE INVEST
[6]  
Audretsch DB., 1995, INNOVATION IND EVOLU
[8]   SENSITIVITY, PRECISION, AND LINEAR AGGREGATION OF SIGNALS FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION [J].
BANKER, RD ;
DATAR, SM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (01) :21-39
[9]  
Barth ME, 1996, ACCOUNT REV, V71, P513
[10]   Rent-seeking and innovation [J].
Boldrin, M ;
Levine, DK .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2004, 51 (01) :127-160