Deliberative group dynamics: power, status and affect in interactive policy making

被引:31
作者
van Stokkom, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Polymer Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
POLICY AND POLITICS | 2005年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
deliberation; interactive policy making; paticipation; power and emotion dynamics;
D O I
10.1332/0305573054325701
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Many proponents of interactive policy making view citizen consultations as a 'rational deliberation between equals'. Power, authority, rhetoric and emotions are considered to be obstructive factors. In this article it is argued that interactive policy settings are characterised by status and authority hierarchies and affect dynamics. First, two types of deliberative bodies are introduced: citizen forums and stakeholder committees. Next, eight possible power and emotion dynamics are distinguished, including problems maintaining facilitative authority, trust-building work of experts, occurrence of charisma, persisting fear and distrust, hope turning into disappointment, and increasing mutual recognition. The last sections examine in which respects these dynamics occur in the two types of deliberative organisation.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 409
页数:23
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]  
Beierle TC, 2000, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V19, P587, DOI 10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO
[12]  
2-Q
[13]  
BRYSON A, 1992, CHARISMA LEADERSHIP
[14]   Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation [J].
Button, M ;
Mattson, K .
POLITY, 1999, 31 (04) :609-637
[15]  
Collins Randall., 2005, INTERACTION RITUAL C
[16]  
Conger JayAlden., 1998, CHARISMATIC LEADERSH
[17]  
Conover PJ, 2002, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V32, P21
[18]  
DIMMENDAAL G, 1999, DIALOOG DIMOCRATIE
[19]  
EDELENBOS J, 1998, SPANNING INTERACTIVE
[20]  
Eisenstadt S.N., 1968, M WEBER CHARISMA I B