Microbial and microfaunal community structure in cropping systems with genetically modified plants

被引:50
作者
Griffiths, Bryan S. [1 ]
Caul, Sandra
Thompson, Jacqueline
Birch, A. Nicholas E.
Cortet, Jerome
Andersen, Mathias N.
Krogh, Paul Henning
机构
[1] Scottish Crop Res Inst, Environm Plant Interact Programme, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland
[2] Lab Sols Environm, UMR 1120, INRA, ENSAIA INPL, F-54505 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[3] Univ Aarhus, Fac Agr Sci, Res Ctr Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[4] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Terr Ecol, Soil Fauna & Ecotoxicol Res Univ, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
关键词
Bt-maize; genetically modified; crops; herbicide tolerant; maize; microbial community; structure; nematodes; protozoa;
D O I
10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.04.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Soils from field sites at Foulum (DK), Narbons (FR) and Varois (FR) planted with genetically modified maize expressing either the insecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis protein (Bt) or herbicide tolerance (HT), as described elsewhere in this volume, were analysed for nematodes, protozoa and microbial community structure. These analyses were mirrored in single-species testing and in mesocosm experiments, and were coordinated with field samples taken for microarthropods, enchytraeids and earthworms so allowing for cross-comparison and a better understanding of the results observed in the field. Over the first 2 years of the field experiments (in 2002 and 2003), the effect of Bt-maize was within the normal variation expected in these agricultural systems. Sampling in 2004 and 2005 was expanded to include the effects of tillage (i.e. reduced tillage versus conventional tillage) and also the use of HT-maize. Tillage had major effects regardless of soil type (Varois or Foulum), with reduced-tillage plots having a greater abundance of microfauna and a different microbial community structure (measured both by phospholipid fatty-acid analysis (PLFA) and by community-level physiological profiling (CLPP)) from conventionally titled plots. Grass, as a contrasting cropping system to maize, also had an effect regardless of soil type and resulted in greater microfaunal abundance and an altered microbial community structure. Differences in crop management, which for the Bt-maize was removal of the insecticide used to control European corn borer and for HT-maize was a change in herbicide formulation, were only tested at single sites. There were differences in microbial community structure (CLPP but not PLFA) and sporadic increases in protozoan abundance under the Bt-crop management. The HT-maize cropping system, which covered a shorter period and only one site, showed little change from the conventional system other than an altered microbial community structure (as measured by PLFA only) at the final harvest. The Bt-trait had a minimal impact, with fewer amoebae at Foulum in May 2003, fewer nematodes at Foulum in May 2004 but more protozoa at Varois in October 2002 and an altered microbial community structure (PLFA) at Foulum in August 2005. These were not persistent effects and could not be distinguished from varietal effects. Based on the field evaluations of microfauna and microorganisms, we conclude that there were no soil ecological consequences for these communities associated with the use of Bt- or HT-maize in place of conventional varieties. Other land management options, such as tillage, crop type and pest management regime, had significantly larger effects on the biology of the soil than the type of maize grown. (C) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 206
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context [J].
Groot, AT ;
Dicke, M .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2002, 31 (04) :387-406
[22]   Statistical analysis of the time-course of Biolog substrate utilization [J].
Hackett, CA ;
Griffiths, BS .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 30 (01) :63-69
[23]   Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods [J].
Haughton, AJ ;
Champion, GT ;
Hawes, C ;
Heard, MS ;
Brooks, DR ;
Bohan, DA ;
Clark, SJ ;
Dewar, AM ;
Firbank, LG ;
Osborne, JL ;
Perry, JN ;
Rothery, P ;
Roy, DB ;
Scott, RJ ;
Woiwod, IP ;
Birchall, C ;
Skellern, MP ;
Walker, JH ;
Baker, P ;
Browne, EL ;
Dewar, AJG ;
Garner, BH ;
Haylock, LA ;
Horne, SL ;
Mason, NS ;
Sands, RJN ;
Walker, MJ .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 358 (1439) :1863-1877
[24]   Microbial response to heavy metal-polluted soils:: Community analysis from phospholipid-linked fatty acids and ester-linked fatty acids extracts [J].
Hinojosa, MB ;
Carreira, JA ;
García-Ruíz, R ;
Dick, RP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2005, 34 (05) :1789-1800
[25]   The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence [J].
Holland, JM .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 103 (01) :1-25
[26]   Effects of transgenic plants on soil microorganisms [J].
Liu, B ;
Zeng, Q ;
Yan, FM ;
Xu, HG ;
Xu, CR .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2005, 271 (1-2) :1-13
[27]   Impact of genetically modified crops and their management on soil microbially mediated plant nutrient transformations [J].
Motavalli, PP ;
Kremer, RJ ;
Fang, M ;
Means, NE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2004, 33 (03) :816-824
[28]   Ester-linked polar lipid fatty acid profiles of soil microbial communities: a comparison of extraction methods and evaluation of interference from humic acids [J].
Nielsen, P ;
Petersen, SO .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 32 (8-9) :1241-1249
[29]   Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms [J].
O'Callaghan, M ;
Glare, TR ;
Burgess, EPJ ;
Malone, LA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2005, 50 :271-292
[30]  
Petersen SO, 2002, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V66, P826, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2002.0826