Sharing the reduction effort to limit global warming to 2°C

被引:44
作者
Den Elzen, Michel [1 ]
Hoehne, Niklas [2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Ecofys Germany, Cologne, Germany
关键词
CO2; allowances; emission allowances; emission reductions; developed countries; developing countries; FUTURE COMMITMENTS; GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE; DIFFERENTIATION; COUNTRIES; CONTRACTION; CONVERGENCE; TRIPTYCH; POLICY;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2009.0678A
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to stabilize long-term greenhouse gas concentrations at 450 ppm CO2-eq or lower, developed countries as a group should reduce emissions by 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020, while developing countries' emissions need to be reduced by around 15-30%, relative to their baseline levels, according to the IPCC and our earlier work. This study examines 19 other studies on the emission reductions attributed to the developed and developing countries for meeting a 450 ppm target. These studies considered different allocation approaches, according to equity principles. The effect of the assumed global emissions cap in these studies is analysed. For developed countries, the original reduction range of 25-40% by 2020 is still within the average range of all studies, but does not cover it completely. Comparing the studies shows that assuming a global emissions cap of 5-15% above 1990 levels by 2020 generally leads to more stringent reduction targets than when a global emissions cap of 20-30% above 1990 levels is assumed. For developing countries, the reduction range of 15-30% below their baseline levels by 2020 corresponds to an increase on the 1990 level from 70% (about the 2006 level) to 120%. Reducing deforestation emissions by 50% below baseline levels by 2020 may relax the emission reductions for either group of countries; for developing countries by about 7% or for developed countries by about 15% (but not for both).
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 260
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, IR08020 IIASA
  • [2] [Anonymous], ANAL POSSIBLE QUANTI
  • [3] [Anonymous], EM DAT GLOB ATM RES
  • [4] Baer P., 2008, GREENHOUSE DEV RIGHT, V2nd
  • [5] Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?
    Berk, Marcel M.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2001, 1 (04) : 465 - 480
  • [6] Bode Sven, 2004, EUROPEAN ENV, V14, P300, DOI DOI 10.1002/EET.359
  • [7] Contraction and convergence: an assessment of the CCOptions model
    Bows, Alice
    Anderson, Kevin
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 91 (3-4) : 275 - 290
  • [8] Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters
    Chakravarty, Shoibal
    Chikkatur, Ananth
    de Coninck, Heleen
    Pacala, Stephen
    Socolow, Robert
    Tavoni, Massimo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (29) : 11884 - 11888
  • [9] Analysing countries' contribution to climate change:: scientific and policy-related choices
    den Elzen, M
    Fuglestvedt, J
    Höhne, N
    Trudinger, C
    Lowe, J
    Matthews, B
    Romstad, B
    de Campos, CP
    Andronova, N
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2005, 8 (06) : 614 - 636
  • [10] Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets
    den Elzen, Michel
    Hohne, Niklas
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 91 (3-4) : 249 - 274