Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP

被引:196
作者
Heo, Eunnyeong [1 ]
Kim, Jinsoo [1 ]
Boo, Kyung-Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Seoul 151744, South Korea
[2] Korea Energy Econ Inst, Div New & Renewable Energy, Uiwang Si 437713, Kyonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Renewable energy; Criteria; Factors; Dissemination program; Fuzzy AHP; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; POWER-PLANTS; SELECTION; METHODOLOGY; STRATEGIES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
By 2030, Korean government aims to increase the share of new and renewable energy sources to 11% in the overall primary energy mix, that is, approximately 33 million TOE. However, carefully designed program is needed given the current low level of the share (2.37%, approximately 5.6 million TOE, as of 2007). Therefore, alongside R&D on new and renewable energy technology, establishing an effective dissemination program is also essential. This would require a decision-making base, for which this study established the criteria and factors and assessed the importance of each factor using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. Five criteria - technological, market-related, economic, environmental, and policy-related - and a total of seventeen factors were established. From the weights estimation results, we derived four major conclusions regarding the importance of economic feasibility, the advancement of the target technology in the global market, the disagreement between the policy maker and the specialist group, and the application of the results. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2214 / 2220
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[12]   A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection [J].
Büyüközkan, G ;
Kahraman, C ;
Ruan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 33 (2-3) :259-280
[13]   Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Er, I. Deha ;
Ozok, A. Fahri .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (01) :190-198
[14]   Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, Niraj .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (04) :417-431
[15]   The development of intelligent decision support tools to aid the design of flexible manufacturing systems [J].
Chan, FTS ;
Jiang, B ;
Tang, NKH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 65 (01) :73-84
[16]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[17]   Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. ;
Pilavachi, Petros A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (03) :1074-1089
[18]   Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight [J].
Cheng, CH ;
Yang, KL ;
Hwang, CL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 116 (02) :423-435
[19]   Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison [J].
Deng, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1999, 21 (03) :215-231
[20]   Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making [J].
Erdogmus, S ;
Aras, H ;
Koç, E .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2006, 10 (03) :269-279