Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic

被引:165
作者
Arnold, Jens M. [1 ]
Javorcik, Beata S. [2 ,3 ]
Mattoo, Aaditya [4 ]
机构
[1] OECD, Dept Econ, F-75116 Paris, France
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Econ, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England
[3] CEPR, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England
[4] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
Services liberalization; Productivity; Foreign direct investment; Privatizations; Foreign acquisitions; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; DOMESTIC FIRMS; SPILLOVERS; DYNAMICS; REFORM; MATTER; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.05.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While there is considerable empirical evidence on the impact of liberalizing trade in goods, the effects of services liberalization have not been empirically established. This study examines the link between services sector reforms and the productivity of manufacturing industries relying on services inputs. Several aspects of services liberalization are considered, namely, the presence of foreign providers, privatization and the level of competition. The results, based on firm-level data from the Czech Republic, show a positive relationship between services sector reform and the performance of domestic firms in downstream manufacturing sectors. Allowing foreign entry into services industries appears to be the key channel through which services liberalization contributes to improved performance of manufacturing sectors. This finding is supported by evidence that foreign acquisitions of Czech services providers result in profound changes in the labor productivity and sales of acquired firms. As most barriers to foreign investment today are not in goods but in services sectors, the findings of this study may strengthen the argument for reform in this area. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 146
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[2]   Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia [J].
Amiti, Mary ;
Konings, Jozef .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (05) :1611-1638
[3]   Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign direct investment and plant productivity in Indonesia [J].
Arnold, Jens Matthias ;
Javorcik, Beata S. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 79 (01) :42-53
[4]   Welfare gains from Foreign Direct Investment through technology transfer to local suppliers [J].
Blalock, Garrick ;
Gertler, Paul J. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 74 (02) :402-421
[5]   Services policy reform and economic growth in transition economies [J].
Eschenbach, Felix ;
Hoekman, Bernard .
REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2006, 142 (04) :746-764
[6]  
ETHIER WJ, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P389
[7]   Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity [J].
Fernald, JG .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :619-638
[8]   Trade policy, trade volumes and plant-level productivity in Colombian manufacturing industries [J].
Fernandes, Ana M. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 71 (01) :52-71
[9]   Assessing the impact of communication costs on international trade [J].
Fink, C ;
Mattoo, A ;
Neagu, IC .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 67 (02) :428-445
[10]   PRODUCER SERVICES, SCALE, AND THE DIVISION-OF-LABOR [J].
FRANCOIS, JF .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1990, 42 (04) :715-729