INCUMBENT FIRM INVENTION IN EMERGING FIELDS: EVIDENCE FROM THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY

被引:72
作者
Jiang, Lin [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Justin [1 ]
Thursby, Marie [2 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Management, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Robert J Trulaske Sr Coll Business, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
emerging technology; nanotechnology; incumbent firm; technological change; public science; inventive output; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS; LOCAL SEARCH; ESTABLISHED FIRMS; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCES; CREATIVE DESTRUCTION; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; MARKET VALUE;
D O I
10.1002/smj.866
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Incumbent firms are often thought to focus on incremental innovations and only respond to a major technological change once its impact on established markets and/or dominant designs becomes clear. We argue, however, that incumbent firms have many reasons to proactively invent early in cycles of technological change. Our interest is in the strategies that allow incumbents to be successful in this endeavor during the infancy of an emerging field-the period before it is clear how the field will affect dominant designs. Our evidence counters the stereotypical view that incumbent firms play a passive role in major technological changes by adhering to incremental inventions in the existing dominant designs. Rather, we find significant inventions by incumbents outside the existing dominant designs and relate their success to their willingness to search novel areas, explore scientific knowledge in the public domain, and form alliances with a balanced portfolio of partners. We find support for our hypotheses using data from the global semiconductor industry between 1989 and 2002. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 75
页数:21
相关论文
共 91 条
[82]  
Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory
[83]   Research and development - Where is the new science in corporate R& D? [J].
Thursby, Jerry ;
Thursby, Marie .
SCIENCE, 2006, 314 (5805) :1547-1548
[84]  
Tripsas M, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P119, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO
[85]  
2-S
[86]   Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change [J].
Tushman, ML ;
OReilly, CA .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 38 (04) :8-&
[87]   TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS [J].
TUSHMAN, ML ;
ANDERSON, P .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1986, 31 (03) :439-465
[88]  
WALSH JP, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P671, DOI 10.5465/256755
[89]  
Zucker LG, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P290
[90]   Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? [J].
Zucker, LG ;
Darby, MR ;
Armstrong, J .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1998, 36 (01) :65-86