Does past volatility affect investors' price forecasts and confidence judgements?

被引:30
作者
Du, Ning
Budescu, David V.
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Depaul Ctr, Sch Accountancy & Management Informat Syst, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
calibration; judgemental forecasting; overconfidence; investment; volatility; PROBABILITY-LEARNING TASKS; STOCK-PRICES; RISK; INTERVALS; CALIBRATION; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; ISSUES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.03.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
This study investigates the influence of past volatility on individual investors' forecasting behavior. We conducted two experiments in which we used real stock prices to construct low- and high-volatility time series, and asked participants to make both point estimates and interval forecasts of future values. We focus on two main aspects of investors' future expectations: (1) forecasts of future price, and (2) subjective confidence of future stock price, which includes 50%, 70% and 90% confidence intervals. Past volatility has a weak effect on future forecasts that are sensitive to minor changes in the characteristics of price series. We found strong evidence that low past volatility increases participants' confidence and improves forecast accuracy. The calibration of the confidence intervals was not affected by the stocks' volatility. However, most confidence intervals were skewed, suggesting that participants use asymmetric confidence intervals to hedge their price forecasts. (C) 2007 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 511
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
THE INFLUENCE OF FORMAL, SUBSTANTIVE, AND CONTEXTUAL TASK PROPERTIES ON THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF FEEDBACK IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY-LEARNING TASKS [J].
ADELMAN, L .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 27 (03) :423-442
[2]
ANG A, 2004, AFA 2005 PHIL M EFA
[3]
[Anonymous], ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC
[4]
Armstrong JS., 1985, LONG RANGE FORECASTI
[5]
ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF EXPERT JUDGMENT - ISSUES AND ANALYSIS [J].
BOLGER, F ;
WRIGHT, G .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1994, 11 (01) :1-24
[6]
Budescu DV, 1997, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V10, P153, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199709)10:3<153::AID-BDM279>3.0.CO
[7]
2-K
[8]
Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions [J].
Budescu, DV ;
Rantilla, AK .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2000, 104 (03) :371-398
[9]
BUDESCU DV, IN PRESS MANAGEMENT
[10]
BETTING ON TRENDS - INTUITIVE FORECASTS OF FINANCIAL RISK AND RETURN [J].
DEBONDT, WFM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1993, 9 (03) :355-371