Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy

被引:20
作者
Leminen, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Helsinki 00029, Finland
关键词
abdominal hysterectomy; laparoscopic hysterectomy; learning curve;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.0790121100.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. To compare personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods. The first 200 patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy and the first 200 patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy by a single operator were compared using learning curves according to operation time, operative blood loss, and occurrence of complications. Results. Learning curves for both types of hysterectomy were rather similiar, but the learning of the laparoscopic procedure seemed to be quicker. With increasing experience the operating time decreased by 25% in abdominal and by 41% in laparoscopic hysterectomies. The mean operating time in abdominal hysterectomy was 74 min and 70 min in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operative blood loss decreased by 50% and 44%, respectively. The mean operative blood loss was smaller (203 vs 295 ml, p<0.0001) in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Increased experience had no effect on complication rates in abdominal hysterectomies, but a decrease of 44% was seen in laparoscopic hysterectomies (p<0.05). The overall complication rate (26% vs 22%) were similar for the two techniques, and only a few patients (1.5% vs 1%) had major (bladder or ureteric) complications. Conclusions. A trained gynecologist can learn the laparoscopic technique for hysterectomy at least as quickly as the abdominal technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1104
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GYNAECOL ENDOSC
[2]   LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - REPORT OF 82 CASES AND COMPARISON WITH ABDOMINAL AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
BOIKE, GM ;
ELFSTRAND, EP ;
DELPRIORE, G ;
SCHUMOCK, D ;
HOLLEY, HS ;
LURAIN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (06) :1690-1701
[3]   A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMIES COMPARED WITH VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMIES UNASSISTED BY LAPAROSCOPY AND TRANSABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMIES [J].
CASEY, MJ ;
GARCIAPADIAL, J ;
JOHNSON, C ;
OSBORNE, NG ;
SOTOLONGO, J ;
WATSON, P .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1994, 10 (01) :7-14
[4]   COMPLICATIONS OF ABDOMINAL AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AMONG WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
DICKER, RC ;
GREENSPAN, JR ;
STRAUSS, LT ;
COWART, MR ;
SCALLY, MJ ;
PETERSON, HB ;
DESTEFANO, F ;
RUBIN, GL ;
ORY, HW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (07) :841-848
[5]   Laparoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal malignancy [J].
Gouma, DJ ;
deWit, T ;
VanDukum, EN ;
VanDelden, O ;
Bemelman, WA ;
Rauws, EAJ ;
VanLanschot, JJB ;
Obertop, H .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 31 :43-49
[6]   EVALUATION AND THE LEARNING-CURVE OF THE FIRST 100 LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMIES [J].
HARKKISIREN, P ;
SJOBERG, J .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 74 (08) :638-641
[7]   Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: A review and complications of 1165 operations [J].
HarkkiSiren, P ;
Sjoberg, J ;
Makinen, J ;
Heinonen, PK ;
Kauko, M ;
Tomas, E ;
Laatikainen, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (01) :118-122
[8]   A COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
HOWARD, FM ;
SANCHEZ, R .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1993, 9 (02) :83-90
[9]   STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN TECHNIQUES [J].
KERBL, K ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
PETROS, JA ;
CHANDHOKE, PS ;
GILL, IS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) :396-398
[10]   Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal - A prospective randomised study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomy [J].
Langebrekke, A ;
Eraker, R ;
Nesheim, BI ;
Urnes, A ;
Busund, B ;
Sponland, G .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 75 (04) :404-407