Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy

被引:20
作者
Leminen, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Helsinki 00029, Finland
关键词
abdominal hysterectomy; laparoscopic hysterectomy; learning curve;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.0790121100.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. To compare personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods. The first 200 patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy and the first 200 patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy by a single operator were compared using learning curves according to operation time, operative blood loss, and occurrence of complications. Results. Learning curves for both types of hysterectomy were rather similiar, but the learning of the laparoscopic procedure seemed to be quicker. With increasing experience the operating time decreased by 25% in abdominal and by 41% in laparoscopic hysterectomies. The mean operating time in abdominal hysterectomy was 74 min and 70 min in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operative blood loss decreased by 50% and 44%, respectively. The mean operative blood loss was smaller (203 vs 295 ml, p<0.0001) in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Increased experience had no effect on complication rates in abdominal hysterectomies, but a decrease of 44% was seen in laparoscopic hysterectomies (p<0.05). The overall complication rate (26% vs 22%) were similar for the two techniques, and only a few patients (1.5% vs 1%) had major (bladder or ureteric) complications. Conclusions. A trained gynecologist can learn the laparoscopic technique for hysterectomy at least as quickly as the abdominal technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1104
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]  
Liu C, 1994, GYNAECOL ENDOSC, V3, P203
[12]   HOW MUCH PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT - A QUANTITATIVE MEASURE OF THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO ACHIEVE PROCEDURAL COMPETENCE [J].
MANU, P ;
LANE, TJ ;
MATTHEWS, DA .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1990, 12 (3-4) :367-369
[13]  
Moore M J, 1995, Am J Surg, V170, P55
[14]   A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Olsson, JH ;
Ellstrom, M ;
Hahlin, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (04) :345-350
[15]   A MULTICENTER REVIEW OF 839 LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMIES [J].
OU, CS ;
BEADLE, E ;
PRESTHUS, J ;
SMITH, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1994, 1 (04) :417-422
[16]   COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND BILATERAL SALPINGO-OPHORECTOMY WITH CONVENTIONAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND BILATERAL SALPINGO-OPHORECTOMY [J].
PHIPPS, JH ;
JOHN, M ;
NAYAK, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (07) :698-700
[17]   A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY EACH WITH BILATERAL SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY [J].
RAJU, KS ;
AULD, BJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (12) :1068-1071
[18]   IS LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY A WASTE OF TIME [J].
RICHARDSON, RE ;
BOURNAS, N ;
MAGOS, AL .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8941) :36-41
[19]   PERCUTANEOUS BALLOON MITRAL VALVULOPLASTY - THE LEARNING-CURVE [J].
RIHAL, CS ;
NISHIMURA, RA ;
HOLMES, DR .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 122 (06) :1750-1756