The impact of dose escalation on secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy of prostate cancer

被引:47
作者
Schneider, Uwe
Lomax, Antony
Besserer, Juergen
Pemler, Peter
Lombriser, Norbert
Kaser-Hotz, Barbara
机构
[1] Triemli Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Nucl Med, Div Med Phys, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Paul Scherrer Inst, Dept Radiat Med, Villigen, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Vetsuisse Fac, Div Diagnost Imaging & Radiooncol, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
organ equivalent dose; secondary cancer; dose escalation; IMRT; proton radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.029
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate secondary cancer risk due to dose escalation in patients treated for prostatic carcinoma with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), and spot-scanned proton RT. Methods and Materials: The organ equivalent dose (OED) concept with a linear-exponential, a plateau, and a linear dose-response curve was applied to dose distributions of 23 patients who received RT of prostate cancer. Conformal RT was used in 7 patients, 8 patients received IMRT with 6- and 15-MV photons, and 8 patients were treated with spot-scanned protons. We applied target doses ranging from 70 Gy to 100 Gy. Cancer risk was estimated as a function of target dose and tumor control probability. Results: At a 100-Gy target dose the secondary cancer risk relative to the 3D treatment plan at 70 Gy was +18.4% (15.0% for a plateau model, 22.3% for a linear model) for the 6-MV IMRT plan, +25.3% (17.0%, 14.1%) for the 15-MV IMRT plan, and -40.7% (-41.3%, -40.0%) for the spot-scanned protons. The increasing risk of developing a radiation-associated malignancy after RT with increasing dose was balanced by the enhanced cure rates at a larger dose. Conclusions: Cancer risk after dose escalation for prostate RT is expected to be equal to or lower than for conventional 3D treatment at 70 Gy, independent of treatment modality or dose-response model. Spot-scanned protons are the treatment of choice for dose escalation because this therapy can halve the risk of secondary cancers. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 897
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Brenner DJ, 2000, CANCER, V88, P398, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<398::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-V
[3]   Depth dose-equivalent and effective energies of photoneutrons generated by 6-18 MV X-ray beams for radiotherapy [J].
d'Errico, F ;
Luszik-Bhadra, M ;
Nath, R ;
Siebert, BRL ;
Wolf, U .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2001, 80 (01) :4-11
[4]   Dose-effect models for risk - relationship to cell survival parameters [J].
Dasu, A ;
Toma-Dasu, I .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (08) :829-835
[5]   The use of risk estimation models for the induction of secondary cancers following radiotherapy [J].
Dasu, A ;
Toma-Dasu, I ;
Olofsson, J ;
Karlsson, M .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (04) :339-347
[6]   Production and killing of second cancer precursor cells in radiation therapy:: In regard to Hall and Wuu (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56:83-88) [J].
Davis, RH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (03) :916-916
[7]   What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer? [J].
Fowler, JF ;
Ritter, MA ;
Chappell, RJ ;
Brenner, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (04) :1093-1104
[8]   Radiation-induced second cancers: The impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT [J].
Hall, EJ ;
Wuu, CS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (01) :83-88
[9]   Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Pinover, WH ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Price, RA ;
Schultheiss, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :823-832
[10]   Preliminary observations on biochemical relapse-free survival rates after short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction) for localized prostate cancer [J].
Kupelian, PA ;
Reddy, CA ;
Carlson, TP ;
Altsman, KA ;
Willoughby, TR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (04) :904-912