Understanding reactions to safety incentives

被引:29
作者
Haines, VY
Merrheim, G
Roy, M
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Adm, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Chair Corp Occupat Hlth & Safety Management, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, DBA Program, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
关键词
health; safety; incentives; compensation; effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant. Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor-subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives. Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment. Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor-subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms. (C) 2001 National Safety Council and Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC ADM Q
[3]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN RESOURCE DEV Q
[4]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, AMOS USERS GUIDE VER
[5]   Using feedback and reinforcement to improve the performance and safety of a roofing crew [J].
Austin, J ;
Kessler, ML ;
Riccobono, JE ;
Bailey, JS .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 1996, 16 (02) :49-75
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysisfor the Behavioral Sciences, V1, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-179060-8.50006-2
[7]   Leader-member exchange quality and effectiveness ratings - The role of subordinate-supervisor conscientiousness similarity [J].
Deluga, RJ .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 1998, 23 (02) :189-216
[8]  
Duff A., 1994, Construction Management and Economics, V12, P67, DOI DOI 10.1080/01446199400000008
[9]   PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT [J].
EISENBERGER, R ;
HUNTINGTON, R ;
HUTCHISON, S ;
SOWA, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 71 (03) :500-507
[10]   PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND EMPLOYEE DILIGENCE, COMMITMENT, AND INNOVATION [J].
EISENBERGER, R ;
FASOLO, P ;
DAVISLAMASTRO, V .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (01) :51-59