Unraveling willingness to cannibalize: a closer look at the barrier to radical innovation

被引:43
作者
Nijssen, EJ
Hillebrand, B
Vermeulen, PAM
机构
[1] Nijmegen Sch Management, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
radical innovation; product development; cannibalization; capabilities; organizational inertia;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2005.03.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the literature it has been suggested that willingness to cannibalize might explain why certain organizations are better at developing radical innovations than other organizations. Yet, a closer inspection of the literature suggests that organizations may cannibalize on previous investments, capabilities, and sales, lending support for the notion of a three-dimensional construct of willingness to cannibalize. The construct was then tested using a sample of Dutch companies. The results confirmed the three-dimensions of willingness to cannibalize. The construct and its dimensions showed anticipated different relationships with other NPD constructs, e.g. future market focus and risk posture of top management. In a second, larger study involving a panel of Dutch SMEs the construct was further checked and its effect on the type of new products developed investigated. Two out of three-dimensions of willingness to cannibalize were correlated with turning out more radical new products. There also was a positive correlation with financial performance. The results confirm that willingness to cannibalize is a multidimensional construct and plays an important role in predicting new product radicalness. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1409
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGE REV
[2]   AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF STAW AND ROSS PRESCRIPTIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT BEHAVIOR IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BARTON, SL ;
DUCHON, D ;
DUNEGAN, KJ .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1989, 20 (03) :532-544
[3]   MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGY - A STRATEGIC COALIGNMENT [J].
CAPON, N ;
GLAZER, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1987, 51 (03) :1-14
[4]   ROLE OF CHAMPION IN PRODUCT INNOVATION [J].
CHAKRABARTI, AK .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1974, 17 (02) :58-62
[5]   Market motives, distinctive capabilities, and domestic inertia: A hybrid model of innovation generation [J].
Chandrashekaran, M ;
Mehta, R ;
Chandrashekaran, R ;
Grewal, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (01) :95-112
[6]   Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize [J].
Chandy, RK ;
Tellis, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (04) :474-487
[7]  
Christensen CM, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P197, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-L
[9]   THE INTERACTION OF DESIGN HIERARCHIES AND MARKET CONCEPTS IN TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION [J].
CLARK, KB .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1985, 14 (05) :235-251
[10]   STRATEGIES FOR PRODUCT CANNIBALISM [J].
CONNER, KR .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1988, 9 :9-26