Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty

被引:152
作者
Abdellaoui, M
Vossmann, F
Weber, M
机构
[1] Ecole Natl Super Arts & Metiers, CNRS, GRID, Maison Rech ESTP, F-94230 Cachan, France
[2] Univ Mannheim, Lehrtuhl Bankbetriebslehre, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
decision under uncertainty; Choquet expected utility; cumulative prospect theory; decision weights; choice-based probabilities; probability weighting;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1050.0388
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper reports the results of an experimental parameter-free elicitation and decomposition of decision weights under uncertainty. Assuming cumulative prospect theory, utility functions were elicited for gains and losses at an individual level using the tradeoff method. Subsequently, decision weights were elicited through certainty equivalents of uncertain two-outcome prospects. Furthermore, decision weights were decomposed using observable choice instead of invoking other empirical primitives, as in previous experimental studies. The choice-based elicitation of decision weights allows for a quantitative study of their characteristics, and also allows, among other things, for the examination of the sign-dependence hypothesis for observed choice under uncertainty. Our results confirm concavity of the utility function in the gain domain and bounded subadditivity of decision weights and choice-based subjective probabilities. We also find evidence for sign dependence of decision weights.
引用
收藏
页码:1384 / 1399
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1485-1496
[3]   EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR UNDER RISK AND UNDER UNCERTAINTY FOR GAINS AND FOR LOSSES [J].
COHEN, M ;
JAFFRAY, JY ;
SAID, T .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 39 (01) :1-22
[4]   RISK, AMBIGUITY, AND THE SAVAGE AXIOMS [J].
ELLSBERG, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1961, 75 (04) :643-669
[5]   A definition of uncertainty aversion [J].
Epstein, LG .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1999, 66 (03) :579-608
[6]   Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses [J].
Etchart-Vincent, N .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2004, 28 (03) :217-235
[7]  
ETCHARTVINCENT N, 2003, THESIS GRID ENSAM PA
[8]   Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method [J].
Fennema, H ;
Van Assen, M .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (03) :277-295
[9]   AMBIGUITY AVERSION AND COMPARATIVE IGNORANCE [J].
FOX, CR ;
TVERSKY, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (03) :585-603
[10]   Options traders exhibit subadditive decision weights [J].
Fox, CR ;
Rogers, BA ;
Tversky, A .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1996, 13 (01) :5-17