A review of psychometric properties of feeding assessment tools used in neonates

被引:51
作者
Howe, Tsu-Hsin [2 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [1 ]
Fu, Chung-Pei [3 ]
Su, Chia-Ting [4 ]
Hsieh, Ching-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] NYU, Steinhardt Sch Culture Educ & Human Dev, Dept Occupat Therapy, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
来源
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING | 2008年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
infant feeding; feeding assessment tool; psychometric properties;
D O I
10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00240.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective : To appraise the psychometric properties of clinical feeding assessment tools used in a neonatal population. Data Sources : PubMed, OvidMedline, CINHAL, and PsycINFO databases from 1980 to 2007. Reference lists of all identified articles were also reviewed. Study Selection : Research reports written in English that utilized or validated clinical feeding assessment tools. Data Extraction : In total, 941 articles were reviewed. Seven neonatal clinical feeding assessment tools were identified and categorized into three groups: tools used for assessing either bottle-feeding or breastfeeding behaviors, tools used only for assessing bottle-feeding behaviors, and tools used only for assessing breastfeeding behaviors. Results : The psychometric properties of none of the seven assessment tools identified were satisfactory, and the limited representativeness of the samples of the psychometric research was noted in all assessment tools identified. The Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale appeared to have been examined more thoroughly and showed more consistent results in psychometric properties than the others, despite its own limitations. Conclusions : A psychometrically sound neonate feeding assessment tool has not yet been empirically validated. Clinicians who use these tools for clinical and research purposes should take into account this lack of evidence of psychometric soundness and interpret results of assessment with precautions. Well-designed research is needed to study the scientific integrity of these instruments for program evaluations in neonatal care.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 349
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Adams D, 1997, J Hum Lact, V13, P279, DOI 10.1177/089033449701300412
[2]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The Transdisciplinary Journal
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice
[5]   A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[6]  
Benson S, 2001, Breastfeed Rev, V9, P27
[7]   BREAST-FEEDING OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
BIER, JAB ;
FERGUSON, A ;
ANDERSON, L ;
SOLOMON, E ;
VOLTAS, C ;
OH, W ;
VOHR, BR .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1993, 123 (05) :773-778
[8]   THE ORAL MOTOR DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS WHO UNDERWENT OROTRACHEAL INTUBATION DURING THE NEONATAL-PERIOD [J].
BIER, JAB ;
FERGUSON, A ;
CHO, C ;
OH, W ;
VOHR, BR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1993, 147 (08) :858-862
[9]  
BRAUN MA, 1986, PHYS OCCUP THER PEDI, V5, P13
[10]   Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Brouwer, S ;
Reneman, MF ;
Dijkstra, PU ;
Groothoff, JW ;
Schellekens, JMH ;
Göeken, LNH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 13 (04) :207-218