A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer

被引:314
作者
Cagiannos, I
Karakiewicz, P
Eastham, JA
Ohori, M
Rabbani, F
Gerigk, C
Reuter, V
Graefen, M
Hammerer, PG
Erbersdobler, A
Huland, H
Kupelian, P
Klein, E
Quinn, DI
Henshall, SM
Grygiel, JJ
Sutherland, RL
Stricker, PD
Morash, CG
Scardino, PT
Kattan, MW
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] St Vincents Hosp, Garvan Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[6] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; lymph node excision; forecasting;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000091805.98960.13
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We developed a preoperative nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: The study was a retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of 7,014 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at 6 institutions between 1985 and 2000. Exclusion criteria consisted of preoperative androgen ablation therapy, salvage radical prostatectomy and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 50 ng/ml. Preoperative predictors of lymph node metastases consisted of pretreatment PSA, clinical stage (1992 TNM) and biopsy Gleason sum. These predictors were used in logistic regression analysis based nomograms to predict the probability of lymph node metastases. Results: Overall 5,510 patients with complete clinical and pathological information were included in the study. Lymph nodes metastases were present in 206 patients (3.7%). Pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage and institution represented predictors of lymph node status (p < 0.001). Bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy of the 3-variable nomogram (clinical stage, Gleason sum and PSA) was 0.76. Inclusion of a fourth variable, which accounts for institutional differences in lymph node metastases, yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.78. The negative predictive value of our nomograms was 0.99 when they predicted 3% or less chance of positive lymph nodes. Conclusions: Using clinical information, we produced 2 calibrated and validated nomograms, which accurately predict pathologically negative lymph nodes in men with localized prostate cancer who are candidates for radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1798 / 1803
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY CAN BE OMITTED IN SELECTED PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM OF PATIENT SELECTION
    BISHOFF, JT
    REYES, A
    THOMPSON, IM
    HARRIS, MJ
    STCLAIR, SR
    GOMELLA, L
    BUTZIN, CA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) : 270 - 274
  • [2] ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER
    BLUESTEIN, DL
    BOSTWICK, DG
    BERGSTRALH, EJ
    OESTERLING, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) : 1315 - 1320
  • [3] STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT
    BRENDLER, CB
    CLEEVE, LK
    ANDERSON, EE
    PAULSON, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (06) : 849 - 850
  • [4] Stage D1 (T1-3, N1-3, M0) prostate cancer: A case-controlled comparison of conservative treatment versus radical prostatectomy
    Cadeddu, JA
    Partin, AW
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [5] OPEN PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A REASSESSMENT
    CAMPBELL, SC
    KLEIN, EA
    LEVIN, HS
    PIEDMONTE, MR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) : 352 - 355
  • [6] Cheng L, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P66, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<66::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-P
  • [8] Prospective validation of an algorithm with systematic sextant biopsy to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma
    Conrad, S
    Graefen, M
    Pichlmeier, U
    Henke, RP
    Erbersdobler, A
    Hammerer, PG
    Huland, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) : 521 - 525
  • [9] INTRAOPERATIVE AND EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF STAGING PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION IN PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA
    DONOHUE, RE
    MANI, JH
    WHITESEL, JA
    AUGSPURGER, RR
    WILLIAMS, G
    FAUVER, HE
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [10] Limited efficacy of preoperative computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients before radical prostatectomy
    Flanigan, RC
    McKay, TC
    Olson, M
    Shankey, TV
    Pyle, J
    Waters, WB
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (03) : 428 - 432