Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery

被引:100
作者
Borowski, D. W.
Kelly, S. B.
Bradburn, D. M.
Wilson, R. G.
Gunn, A.
Ratcliffe, A. A.
机构
[1] Inst Human Genet, Ctr Life, NORCCAG, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4BZ, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] N Tyneside Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, N Shields, England
[3] Wansbeck Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Ashington, England
[4] James Cook Hosp, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
[5] Univ Durham, Wolfson Res Inst, Stockton On tees, England
关键词
RECTAL-CANCER; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.5721
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several studies have shown a relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of surgeon volume and specialization on primary tumour resection rate, restoration of bowel continuity following rectal cancer resection, anastomotic leakage and perioperative mortality. Methods: The Northern Region Colorectal Cancer Audit Group conducts a population-based audit of patients with colorectal cancer managed by surgeons. This study examined 8219 patients treated between 1998 and 2002. Outcomes were modelled using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Tumour resection was performed in 6949 (93.8 per cent) of 7411 patients. High-volume surgeons with an annual caseload of at least 18.5 (odds ratio (OR) 1.53 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.10 to 2.12); P = 0.012) and colorectal specialists (OR 1.42 (95 per cent c.i. 1.06 to 1.90); P = 0.018) were more likely to perform elective sphincter-saving rectal surgery. In elective surgery, the risk of perioperative death was lower for high-volume surgeons (OR 0.58 (95 per cent c.i. 0.44 to 0.76); P < 0.001), but this was not the case in emergency surgery. Conclusion: High-volume surgeons had lower perioperative mortality rates for elective surgery, and were more likely to use restorative rectal procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 889
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NHS CANC PLAN PLAN I
[2]  
*ASS COL GREAT BRI, 2001, GUID MAN COL CANC
[3]   LOTHIAN AND BORDERS LARGE-BOWEL CANCER PROJECT - IMMEDIATE OUTCOME AFTER SURGERY - THE CONSULTANT SURGEONS AND PATHOLOGISTS OF THE LOTHIAN AND BORDERS HEALTH BOARDS [J].
CARTER, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (07) :888-890
[4]   Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection [J].
Harmon, JW ;
Tang, DG ;
Gordon, TA ;
Bowman, HM ;
Choti, MA ;
Kaufman, HS ;
Bender, JS ;
Duncan, MD ;
Magnuson, TH ;
Lillemoe, KD ;
Cameron, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :404-411
[5]   The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgery [J].
Hermanek, P ;
Hohenberger, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 22 (03) :213-215
[6]  
HERMANEK P, 1995, TUMORI, V81, P60
[7]   Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study [J].
Kee, F ;
Wilson, RH ;
Harper, C ;
Patterson, CC ;
McCallion, K ;
Houston, RF ;
Moorehead, RJ ;
Sloan, JM ;
Rowlands, BJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7195) :1381-1385
[8]   Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer [J].
Marusch, F ;
Koch, A ;
Schmidt, U ;
Pross, M ;
Gastinger, I ;
Lippert, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (10) :1397-1402
[9]   Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer [J].
McArdle, CS ;
Hole, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (05) :610-617
[10]  
Mella J, 1997, BRIT J SURG, V84, P1731