Evaluating the impacts of land management and climate variability on crop production and nitrate export across the Upper Mississippi Basin

被引:85
作者
Donner, SD
Kucharik, CJ
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Grad Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Gaylord Nelson Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Sustainabil & Global Environm, Madison, WI 53726 USA
关键词
nitrogen; Mississippi River; agriculture; crop yield; nitrate flux; aquatic biogeochemistry;
D O I
10.1029/2001GB001808
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[1] The increased use of nitrogen (N) fertilizers in the Mississippi Basin since the 1950s is partially responsible for an increase in crop production, but also a massive increase in nitrate export by the Mississippi River. We used the IBIS terrestrial ecosystem model, including new maize and soybean submodels, and the HYDRA hydrological transport model to investigate the role of climate variability, land cover and N-fertilizer application on crop yield, N cycling and nitrate export in the Upper Mississippi Basin from 1974 - 1994. Simulated annual mean maize and soybean yields were both within 20% of USDA historical estimates in over 80% of the crop-growing counties. There was also strong agreement between simulated and USGS estimated annual nitrate export for the Mississippi River at Clinton, Iowa (r(2) = 0.81), the outlet of the basin, and the Minnesota River at Jordan, Minnesota (r(2) = 0.78). The model also indicated a 30% increase in N-fertilizer application across the basin would have caused only a 4% increase in mean maize yield, but a 53% increase in mean dissolved inorganic nitrogen ( DIN) leaching, while a 30% decrease in N-fertilizer application would have caused a 10% decrease in maize yield, but a 37% decrease in DIN leaching. At higher levels of N-fertilizer usage, nitrate export becomes increasingly sensitive to the hydrologic conditions, particularly when there is ample residual N in the soil. Therefore any effort to reduce nitrate export without significantly affecting crop yields would have to account for previous soil-N conditions and climate variability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 83 条
[21]   Modeling nitrate nitrogen leaching in response to nitrogen fertilizer rate and tile drain depth or spacing for southern Minnesota, USA [J].
Davis, DM ;
Gowda, PH ;
Mulla, DJ ;
Randall, GW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (05) :1568-1581
[22]   Evaluating the performance of a land Surface/ecosystem model with biophysical measurements from contrasting environments [J].
Delire, C ;
Foley, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D14) :16895-16909
[23]   Modeling the impact of hydrological changes on nitrate transport in the Mississippi River Basin from 1955 to 1994 [J].
Donner, SD ;
Coe, MT ;
Lenters, JD ;
Twine, TE ;
Foley, JA .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2002, 16 (03)
[24]  
DONNER SD, 2003, IN PRESS GLOBAL ECOL
[25]   Spatial scales of climate information for simulating wheat and maize productivity: the case of the US Great Plains [J].
Easterling, WE ;
Weiss, A ;
Hays, CJ ;
Mearns, LO .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1998, 90 (1-2) :51-63
[26]   AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS OF AND RESPONSES TO CLIMATE-CHANGE IN THE MISSOURI-IOWA-NEBRASKA-KANSAS (MINK) REGION [J].
EASTERLING, WE ;
CROSSON, PR ;
ROSENBERG, NJ ;
MCKENNEY, MS ;
KATZ, LA ;
LEMON, KM .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1993, 24 (1-2) :23-61
[27]  
EASTERLING WE, 1996, CLIM RES, V6, P163
[28]   PLANTING DATE AND SOYBEAN YIELD - EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL-EFFECTS WITH A CROP SIMULATION-MODEL - SOYGRO [J].
EGLI, DB ;
BRUENING, W .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1992, 62 (1-2) :19-29
[29]   An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics [J].
Foley, JA ;
Prentice, IC ;
Ramankutty, N ;
Levis, S ;
Pollard, D ;
Sitch, S ;
Haxeltine, A .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1996, 10 (04) :603-628
[30]   Nitrogen fertilizer: Retrospect and prospect [J].
Frink, CR ;
Waggoner, PE ;
Ausubel, JH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (04) :1175-1180