Outcomes in kidney transplantation

被引:52
作者
Djamali, A
Premasathian, N
Pirsch, JD
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Madison, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0270-9295(03)00066-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is estimated that there are greater than 100,000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control. Tacrolimus compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 316
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
ABTAHI P, 2001, GRAFT, V4, P266
[2]  
Ahsan N, 1999, TRANSPLANTATION, V68, P1865
[3]   Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: Results at 2 years [J].
Ahsan, N ;
Johnson, C ;
Gonwa, T ;
Halloran, P ;
Stegall, M ;
Hardy, M ;
Metzger, R ;
Shield, C ;
Rocher, L ;
Scandling, J ;
Sorensen, J ;
Mulloy, L ;
Light, J ;
Corwin, C ;
Danovitch, G ;
Wachs, M ;
VanVeldhuisen, P ;
Salm, K ;
Tolzman, D ;
Fitzsimmons, WE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (02) :245-250
[4]   Reduced kidney function and anemia as risk factors for mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction [J].
Al-Ahmad, A ;
Rand, WM ;
Manjunath, G ;
Konstam, MA ;
Salem, DN ;
Levey, AS ;
Sarnak, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (04) :955-962
[5]  
Barnas U, 1997, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V12, P82
[6]   Hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients treated with sirolimus (rapamycin) [J].
Brattström, C ;
Wilczek, H ;
Tydén, G ;
Böttiger, Y ;
Säwe, J ;
Groth, CG .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (09) :1272-1274
[7]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil [J].
Bullingham, RES ;
Nicholls, AJ ;
Kanmm, BR .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1998, 34 (06) :429-455
[8]   Renal transplant patient compliance with free immunosuppressive medications [J].
Chisholm, MA ;
Vollenweider, LJ ;
Mulloy, LL ;
Jagadeesan, M ;
Wynn, JJ ;
Rogers, HE ;
Wade, WE ;
DiPiro, JT .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (08) :1240-1244
[9]   Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) [J].
Cleeman, JI ;
Grundy, SM ;
Becker, D ;
Clark, LT ;
Cooper, RS ;
Denke, MA ;
Howard, WJ ;
Hunninghake, DB ;
Illingworth, DR ;
Luepker, RV ;
McBride, P ;
McKenney, JM ;
Pasternak, RC ;
Stone, NJ ;
Van Horn, L ;
Brewer, HB ;
Ernst, ND ;
Gordon, D ;
Levy, D ;
Rifkind, B ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Savage, P ;
Haffner, SM ;
Orloff, DG ;
Proschan, MA ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Sempos, CT ;
Shero, ST ;
Murray, EZ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19) :2486-2497
[10]   Recommendations for the implementation of Neoral C2 monitoring in clinical practice [J].
Cole, E ;
Midtvedt, K ;
Johnston, A ;
Pattison, J ;
O'Grady, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (09) :S19-S22