Outcomes in kidney transplantation

被引:52
作者
Djamali, A
Premasathian, N
Pirsch, JD
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Madison, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0270-9295(03)00066-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is estimated that there are greater than 100,000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control. Tacrolimus compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 316
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]  
Kasiske BL, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, pS1
[32]   TACROLIMUS - A NEW IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT [J].
KELLY, PA ;
BURCKART, GJ ;
VENKATARAMANAN, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1995, 52 (14) :1521-1535
[33]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[34]   Hyperlipidemia in solid organ transplantation [J].
Kobashigawa, JA ;
Kasiske, BL .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (03) :331-338
[35]   Controlling the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease: Where do we start? [J].
Levey, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 32 (05) :S5-S13
[36]   Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes [J].
Lewis, EJ ;
Hunsicker, LG ;
Clarke, WR ;
Berl, T ;
Pohl, MA ;
Lewis, JB ;
Ritz, E ;
Atkins, RC ;
Rohde, R ;
Raz, I .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) :851-860
[37]   THE EFFECT OF ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION ON DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY [J].
LEWIS, EJ ;
HUNSICKER, LG ;
BAIN, RP ;
ROHDE, RD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (20) :1456-1462
[38]   Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in chronic allograft nephropathy [J].
Lin, J ;
Valeri, AM ;
Markowitz, GS ;
D'Agati, VD ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Radhakrishnan, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (05) :783-788
[39]  
Lorenz M, 2002, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V13, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V133794
[40]   A worldwide, phase III, randomized, controlled, safety and efficacy study of a sirolimus/cyclosporine regimen for prevention of acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts [J].
MacDonald, AS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (02) :271-280