Exposure to ambient and nonambient components of particulate matter - A comparison of health effects

被引:165
作者
Ebelt, ST
Wilson, WE
Brauer, M
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Occupat & Environm Hyg, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Assessment, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ede.0000158918.57071.3e
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Numerous epidemiologic studies report associations between outdoor concentrations of particles and adverse health effects. Because personal exposure to particles is frequently dominated by exposure to nonambient particles (those originating from indoor sources), we present an approach to evaluate the relative impacts of ambient and nonambient exposures. Methods: We developed separate estimates of exposures to ambient and nonambient particles of different size ranges (PM2.5, PM10-2.5 and PM10) based on time-activity data and the use of particle sulfate measurements as a tracer for indoor infiltration of ambient particles. To illustrate the application of these estimates, associations between cardiopulmonary health outcomes and the estimated exposures were compared with associations computed using measurements of personal exposures and outdoor concentrations for a repeated-measures panel study of 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease conducted in the summer of 1998 in Vancouver. Results: Total personal fine particle exposures were dominated by exposures to nonambient particles, which were not correlated with ambient fine particle exposures or ambient concentrations. Although total and nonambient particle exposures were not associated with any of the health outcomes, ambient exposures (and to a lesser extent ambient concentrations) were associated with decreased lung function, decreased systolic blood pressure, increased heart rate, and increased supraventricular ectopic heartbeats. Measures of heart rate variability showed less consistent relationships among the various exposure metrics. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the usefulness of separating total personal particle exposures into their ambient and nonambient components. The results support previous epidemiologic findings using ambient concentrations by demonstrating an association between health outcomes and ambient (outdoor origin) particle exposures but not with nonambient (indoor origin) particle exposures.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 405
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations
    Abt, E
    Suh, HH
    Catalano, P
    Koutrakis, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (17) : 3579 - 3587
  • [2] Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area
    Abt, E
    Suh, HH
    Allen, G
    Koutrakis, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [3] Assessment of indoor fine aerosol contributions from environmental tobacco smoke and cooking with a portable nephelometer
    Brauer, M
    Hirtle, R
    Lang, B
    Ott, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02): : 136 - 144
  • [4] Exposure of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to particles: Respiratory and cardiovascular health effects
    Brauer, M
    Ebelt, ST
    Fisher, TV
    Brumm, J
    Petkau, AJ
    Vedal, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (06): : 490 - 500
  • [5] Ozone personal exposures and health effects for selected groups residing in the Fraser Valley
    Brauer, M
    Brook, JR
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (14) : 2113 - 2121
  • [6] Air pollution: The "heart" of the problem
    Brook, RD
    Brook, JR
    Rajagopalan, S
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2003, 5 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [7] Exposure of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to particulate matter: Relationships between personal and ambient air concentrations
    Ebelt, ST
    Petkau, AJ
    Vedal, S
    Fisher, TV
    Brauer, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2000, 50 (07): : 1081 - 1094
  • [8] Receptor modeling of ambient and personal exposure samples: 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study
    Hopke, PK
    Ramadan, Z
    Paatero, P
    Norris, GA
    Landis, MS
    Williams, RW
    Lewis, CW
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (23) : 3289 - 3302
  • [9] Asian dust events of April 1998
    Husar, RB
    Tratt, DM
    Schichtel, BA
    Falke, SR
    Li, F
    Jaffe, D
    Gassó, S
    Gill, T
    Laulainen, NS
    Lu, F
    Reheis, MC
    Chun, Y
    Westphal, D
    Holben, BN
    Gueymard, C
    McKendry, I
    Kuring, N
    Feldman, GC
    McClain, C
    Frouin, RJ
    Merrill, J
    DuBois, D
    Vignola, F
    Murayama, T
    Nickovic, S
    Wilson, WE
    Sassen, K
    Sugimoto, N
    Malm, WC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D16): : 18317 - 18330
  • [10] Personal exposure to fine particles in children correlates closely with ambient fine particles
    Janssen, NAH
    Hoek, G
    Harssema, H
    Brunekreef, B
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1999, 54 (02): : 95 - 101