Privatizing biomedical research - a 'third way'

被引:13
作者
Bouchard, Ron A. [1 ]
Lemmens, Trudo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Law & Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Law & Med, Toronto, ON M5S 2C5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nbt0108-31
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The allocation of risks and benefits of publicly sponsored biomedical research is becoming increasingly skewed toward for-profit entities and against the public interest. A legitimate solution to this imbalance would be to levy compulsory government royalty fees on commercial products made possible by public efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Looking for solid ground along the Critical Path [J].
Ratner, Mark .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 24 (08) :885-887
[42]  
Ravetz Jerome R., 1971, Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems
[43]   AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES AND TECHNICAL ADVANCE IN INDUSTRY [J].
ROSENBERG, N ;
NELSON, RR .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1994, 23 (03) :323-348
[44]   Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole [J].
Sampat, Bhaven N. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (06) :772-789
[45]   Clinical trial registration:: transparency is the watchword [J].
Sim, I ;
Chan, AW ;
Gülmezoglu, AM ;
Evans, T ;
Pang, T .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9523) :1631-1633
[46]  
Stolberg S G, 2000, N Y Times Web, pA15
[47]  
United Nations, 1976, INT CONV EC SOC CULT
[48]  
*US C, 1993, PHARM R D COSTS RISK
[49]  
*US FDA, 2007, CRIT PATH WHIT PAP I
[50]  
*US NIH, 2001, NIH RESP C REP REQ P