From Average Joe's happiness to Miserable Jane and Cheerful John: using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution

被引:316
作者
Binder, Martin [1 ]
Coad, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Econ, Evolutionary Econ Grp, D-07745 Jena, Germany
关键词
Quantile regressions; Subjective well-being; Happiness; Life satisfaction; Mental well-being; BHPS; LIFE SATISFACTION; RELATIONAL GOODS; UTILITY; INCOME; ADAPTATION; VARIABLES; ECONOMY; GROWTH; MONEY; HAPPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Standard regression techniques are only able to give an incomplete picture of the relationship between subjective well-being and its determinants since the very idea of conventional estimators such as OLS is the averaging out over the whole distribution: studies based on such regression techniques thus are implicitly only interested in Average Joe's happiness. Using cross-sectional data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) for the year 2006, we apply quantile regressions to analyze effects of a set of explanatory variables on different quantiles of the happiness distribution and compare these results with a standard regression. Among our results we observe a decreasing importance of income, health status and social factors with increasing quantiles of happiness. Another finding is that education has a positive association with happiness at the lower quantiles but a negative association at the upper quantiles. We explore the robustness of our findings in various ways. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 290
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[41]   Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins [J].
Gardner, Jonathan ;
Oswald, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 26 (01) :49-60
[42]   Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia [J].
Graham, C ;
Eggers, A ;
Sukhtankar, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2004, 55 (03) :319-342
[43]  
GROSSMAN M, 2005, 11582 NBER
[44]  
Hao L., 2007, Quantile Regression, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412985550
[45]   The Set Point Theory of Well-Being Has Serious Flaws: On the Eve of a Scientific Revolution? [J].
Headey, Bruce .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2010, 97 (01) :7-21
[46]   How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being [J].
Helliwell, JF .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2003, 20 (02) :331-360
[47]  
Hohl K., 2009, Beyond the average case: The mean focus fallacy of standard linear regression, and the use of quantile regression for the social sciences
[48]  
Johnston D. W., 2009, J HLTH EC, V28, P504
[49]   WHEN MORE PAIN IS PREFERRED TO LESS - ADDING A BETTER END [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
FREDRICKSON, BL ;
SCHREIBER, CA ;
REDELMEIER, DA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (06) :401-405
[50]   Why isn't growth making us happier? Utility on the hedonic treadmill [J].
Keely, LC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2005, 57 (03) :333-355