Anniversary paper: Evaluation of medical imaging systems

被引:44
作者
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Jiang, Yulei
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
system evaluation; medical imaging; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis; diagnostic accuracy; observer study; workflow efficiency;
D O I
10.1118/1.2830376
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Medical imaging used to be primarily within the domain of radiology, but with the advent of virtual pathology slides and telemedicine, imaging technology is expanding in the healthcare enterprise. As new imaging technologies are developed, they must be evaluated to assess the impact and benefit on patient care. The authors review the hierarchical model of the efficacy of diagnostic imaging systems by Fryback and Thornbury [Med. Decis. Making 11, 88-94 (1991)] as a guiding principle for system evaluation. Evaluation of medical imaging systems encompasses everything from the hardware and software used to acquire, store, and transmit images to the presentation of images to the interpreting clinician. Evaluation of medical imaging systems can take many forms, from the purely technical (e.g., patient dose measurement) to the increasingly complex (e.g., determining whether a new imaging method saves lives and benefits society). Evaluation methodologies cover a broad range, from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques that measure diagnostic accuracy to timing studies that measure image-interpretation workflow efficiency. The authors review briefly the history of the development of evaluation methodologies and review ROC methodology as well as other types of evaluation methods. They discuss unique challenges in system evaluation that face the imaging community today and opportunities for future advances. (C) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 659
页数:15
相关论文
共 200 条
[111]  
Krupinski Elizabeth A, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P433
[112]  
Kundel Harold L, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.023
[113]   VISUAL SCANNING, PATTERN-RECOGNITION AND DECISION-MAKING IN PULMONARY NODULE DETECTION [J].
KUNDEL, HL ;
NODINE, CF ;
CARMODY, D .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1978, 13 (03) :175-181
[114]   Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold [J].
Lee, Kyoung Ho ;
Kim, Young Hoon ;
Kim, Bo Hyoung ;
Kim, Kil Joong ;
Kim, Tae Jung ;
Kim, Hyuk Jung ;
Hahn, Seokyung .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (06) :1529-1534
[115]   Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: Results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) Trial [J].
Lehman, CD ;
Blume, JD ;
Thickman, D ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Pisano, E ;
Kuhl, C ;
Julian, TB ;
Hylton, N ;
Weatherall, P ;
O'Loughlin, M ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Schnall, MD .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 92 (01) :9-15
[116]   Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations [J].
Lewin, JM ;
Hendrick, RE ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Isaacs, PK ;
Moss, LJ ;
Karellas, A ;
Sisney, GA ;
Kuni, CC ;
Cutter, GR .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :873-880
[117]   Computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic CT [J].
Li, Q ;
Li, F ;
Suzuki, K ;
Shiraishi, J ;
Abe, H ;
Engelmann, R ;
Nie, YK ;
MacMahon, H ;
Doi, K .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2005, 26 (05) :357-363
[118]   Accuracy a diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information - A systematic review [J].
Loy, CT ;
Irwig, L .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13) :1602-1609
[119]  
LUSTED LB, 1969, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V7, P435
[120]   LOGICAL ANALYSIS IN ROENTGEN DIAGNOSIS - MEMORIAL FUND LECTURE [J].
LUSTED, LB .
RADIOLOGY, 1960, 74 (02) :178-193