Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together

被引:160
作者
Brugnach, M. [1 ]
Ingram, H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Arizona, Southwest Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
Ambiguity; Natural resources management; Water management; Water policy; Collective decision making; Knowledge production process; Multiple ways of knowing; Participation; Framing; NATURAL-RESOURCES; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; SCIENCE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the claims of inclusiveness advanced by integrative approaches to resource management, the substance of decisions hardly reflect the diversity of meanings and interpretations that the inclusion of multiple actors implies. We assess the knowledge production processes currently employed in natural resources management, particularly water resources, and claim that part of this problem resides in how ambiguity is handled. From this perspective, we suggest that coping with ambiguity requires a reformulation of the knowledge production processes employed, in terms of the types of knowledge used, how and by whom it is created, what values are incorporated and how values are weighted. Here, we discuss the flawed assumptions of the operative knowledge production processes and the characteristics and challenges of knowledge production models better able to cope with ambiguity through integrative practices. Finally, we provide practical recommendations to facilitate implementation of knowledge co-production processes that can better actualize integration based on deliberation, open space for dialogue, negotiation and learning. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 71
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[11]   Community-based conservation in a globalized world [J].
Berkes, Fikret .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (39) :15188-15193
[12]   Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning [J].
Berkes, Fikret .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (05) :1692-1702
[13]   Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management [J].
Blomquist, W ;
Schlager, E .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2005, 18 (02) :101-117
[14]   Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management [J].
Bouwen, R ;
Taillieu, T .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :137-153
[15]  
Bouwen R., 2001, Career Development, V6, P361
[16]   Discrete choice with social interactions [J].
Brock, WA ;
Durlauf, SN .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2001, 68 (02) :235-260
[17]  
Brown F.Lee., 1987, Water and Poverty in the Southwest
[18]   More is not always better Coping with ambiguity in natural resources management [J].
Brugnach, M. ;
Dewulf, A. ;
Henriksen, H. J. ;
van der Keur, P. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (01) :78-84
[19]  
Brugnach M., 2011, WATER CULTURAL DIVER
[20]  
BRUGNACH M, 2007, ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED