International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition

被引:162
作者
Kim, Kyunam [1 ]
Kim, Yeonbae [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program, Seoul 151742, South Korea
关键词
Decomposition analysis; DEA analysis; Energy efficiency paradox; CO2; emission; Production technology; MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; OECD; GROWTH; INTENSITIES; PROGRESS; OUTPUT; INPUT; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As global concern about climate change increases, the need to control and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions is likely to emerge as a worldwide policy agenda. We determined world-wide carbon dioxide (CO2) emission trends and six underlying forces driving emissions from the industry sector with production-based decomposition from 1990 to 2006. We also conducted a cross-country analysis in order to identify each country's technical potential for improving its CO2 intensity. Our model provides more detailed information about the influence of both production technical efficiency and technological change on CO2 emissions and we show that the relative degree of each country's energy efficiency paradox phenomenon can be identified empirically. As a result, trends show that economic activity change has been the dominant contributor to the growth of CO2 emissions while changes in potential energy intensity and energy mix have led to emission reduction in almost all OECD and non-OECD countries. In the impacts of production technology (i.e., technical efficiency and technological change), the study reveals mixed results but generally shows that OECD countries diffuse their production technologies more efficiently than do non-OECD countries. From emission mitigation potentials, we also identified that many OECD and non-OECD countries have demonstrated a reduced potential for mitigation over time. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1724 / 1741
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry [J].
Asmild, M ;
Paradi, JC ;
Aggarwall, V ;
Schaffnit, C .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :67-89
[12]   THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) :1393-1414
[13]   MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1982, 92 (365) :73-86
[14]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[15]  
Cooper W.W., 2006, DEA SOLVER SOFTWARE
[16]   Investment in energy efficiency: Do the characteristics of firms matter? [J].
DeCanio, SJ ;
Watkins, WE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1998, 80 (01) :95-107
[17]   Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation:: Comment [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 157 (01) :242-245
[18]   Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in African agriculture [J].
Nkamleu, GB .
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2004, 16 (01) :203-222
[19]   An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms - Application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities [J].
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Tyteca, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) :161-175
[20]   Theory and application of directional distance functions [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2000, 13 (02) :93-103