Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials

被引:62
作者
Guerrero, M [1 ]
Harjai, K
Stone, GW
Brodie, B
Cox, D
Boura, J
Grines, L
O'Neill, W
Grines, C
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[2] Guthrie Clin, Sayre, PA USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
[5] Moses Cone Hosp, Greensboro, NC USA
[6] Mid Carolina Cardiol, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The presence of bundle branch block (BBB) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients who have acute myocardial infarction. Whether this is true in the angioplasty era is not known. We sought to evaluate the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction and BBB who were treated with primary angioplasty. We evaluated 3,053 patients who underwent emergency catheterization in the PAMI trials. Patients who had left BBB (n = 48, 1.6%) on presenting electrocardiogram were compared with patients who had right BBB (n = 95,3.1%) or no BBB (n = 2,910,95.3%). Patients who had BBB were older and more frequently had diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and previous coronary artery bypass grafting.. They had lower ejection fraction and more multivessel disease. There were no significant differences in door-to-balloon time, final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade or stent use. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (death, ischemic target vessel revascularization, and reinfarction) were higher in patients who had BBB due primarily to increased in-hospital death (left BBB 14.6%, right BBB 7.4%, no BBB 2.8%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, left BBB was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio 5.53,95% confidence interval 1.89 to 16.1, p = 0.002). In conclusion, patients who have acute myocardial infarction and BBB have increased co-morbidities and higher mortality rates despite treatment with primary angioplasty. Despite early identification of multivessel disease with triage to angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting, if necessary, similar treatment times, and final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow, the presence of left BBB on admission electrocardiogram in patients who have acute myocardial infarction is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Because 85% of deaths in patients who have left BBB occur within the first week, these patients should be recognized early and receive prompt and aggressive treatment. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 488
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Implications of left bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty [J].
Moreno, R ;
García, E ;
de Sá, EL ;
Abeytua, M ;
Soriano, J ;
Ortega, A ;
Rubio, R ;
López-Sendón, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (04) :401-+
[22]  
OTTERSTAD JE, 1978, ACTA MED SCAND, V203, P529
[23]   The prognostic significance of intermediate QRS prolongation in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Pudil, R ;
Feinberg, MS ;
Hod, H ;
Boyko, V ;
Mandelzweig, L ;
Behar, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 78 (03) :233-239
[24]   INFLUENCE OF RIGHT BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK ON SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER ACUTE ANTERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
RICOU, F ;
NICOD, P ;
GILPIN, E ;
HENNING, H ;
ROSS, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (04) :858-863
[25]   Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block [J].
Sgarbossa, EB ;
Pinski, SL ;
Barbagelata, A ;
Underwood, DA ;
Gates, KB ;
Topol, EJ ;
Califf, RM ;
Wagner, GS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (08) :481-487
[26]   Predictors of in-hospital bundle branch block reversion after presenting with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block [J].
Sgarbossa, EB ;
Pinski, SL ;
Gates, KB ;
Wagner, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (03) :373-+
[27]   Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: Clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic [J].
Sgarbossa, EB ;
Pinski, SL ;
Topol, EJ ;
Califf, RM ;
Barbagelata, A ;
Goodman, SG ;
Gates, KB ;
Granger, CB ;
Miller, DP ;
Underwood, DA ;
Wagner, GS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (01) :105-110
[28]   Treatment and outcomes of left bundle-branch block patients with myocardial infarction who present without chest pain [J].
Shlipak, MG ;
Go, AS ;
Frederick, PD ;
Malmgren, J ;
Barron, HV ;
Canto, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :706-712
[29]   A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty [J].
Stone, GW ;
Marsalese, D ;
Brodie, BR ;
Griffin, JJ ;
Donohue, B ;
Costantini, C ;
Balestrini, C ;
Wharton, T ;
Esente, P ;
Spain, M ;
Moses, J ;
Nobuyoshi, M ;
Ayres, M ;
Jones, D ;
Mason, D ;
Grines, L ;
ONeill, WW ;
Grines, CL ;
Sachs, D ;
Graham, M ;
McKinney, P ;
Jewett, H ;
Kreis, A ;
Brodsky, M ;
Friedman, H ;
Gangadharan, V ;
Goldman, L ;
Levin, R ;
Pavlides, G ;
Ramos, R ;
Safian, R ;
Savas, V ;
Schreiber, T ;
Ajluni, S ;
Almany, S ;
Boatman, J ;
StGoar, FG ;
Bavor, C ;
Constantino, R ;
Klughaupt, M ;
Saah, I ;
Bough, E ;
Osterle, S ;
McWard, C ;
Stuckey, TD ;
Weintraub, RA ;
Gregory, T ;
Bondy, DR ;
Lasorda, DM ;
Begg, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (07) :1459-1467
[30]   Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site - (The PAMI-no SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty [J].
Wharton, TP ;
Grines, LL ;
Turco, MA ;
Johnston, JD ;
Souther, J ;
Lew, DC ;
Shaikh, AZ ;
Bilnoski, W ;
Singhi, SK ;
Atay, AE ;
Sinclair, N ;
Shaddinger, DE ;
Barsamian, M ;
Graham, M ;
Boura, J ;
Grines, CL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (11) :1943-1950