Phase I study of S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0002)

被引:32
作者
Takiuchi, H
Narahara, H
Tsujinaka, T
Gotoh, M
Kawabe, S
Katsu, K
Iishi, H
Tatsuta, M
Fujitani, K
Furukawa, H
Taguchi, T
机构
[1] Osaka Med Coll, Dept Internal Med 2, Osaka 5698686, Japan
[2] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, Osaka, Japan
[3] Osaka Natl Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[4] Sakai Municipal Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[5] Japan Soc Canc Chemotherapy, Osaka, Japan
关键词
S-1; irinotecan; combination chemotherapy; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyi148
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 21 consecutive days followed by a 2 week rest. CPT-11 was given intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each course, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m(2)/day, stepping up to 60, 80, 100 or 120 mg/m(2)/day depending on the DLT. Courses were repeated every 5 weeks, unless disease progression or severe toxicity was observed. At a level of the RD, five patients were added to conduct a pharmacokinetic (PK) study. Results: A total of 24 patients were entered in this study. The MTD of CPT-11 was considered to be 100 mg/m(2), because 50% of the patients (3/6) developed DLTs, diarrhea and rash. Therefore, the RD of CPT-11 was set at the dose immediately below 80 mg/m(2). The overall response rate (RR) by the criteria of the Japanese Research Society of Gastric Cancer was 58.3% (14/24) and the RR at the RD was 66.7% (6/9), suggesting promising clinical efficacy. There were no significant differences between the PK parameters of S-1 on days 10 and 15. Conclusions: S-1 with CPT-11 can be combined safely without CPT-11 effect on S-1 PK data and holds promise as an effective regimen for advanced gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A phase II study of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated gastric adenocarcinoma [J].
Blanke, CD ;
Haller, DG ;
Benson, AB ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Berlin, J ;
Mori, M ;
Hsieh, YC ;
Miller, LL .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (11) :1575-1580
[2]   Phase II study of a combination of irinotecan and cisplatin against metastatic gastric cancer [J].
Boku, N ;
Ohtsu, A ;
Shimada, Y ;
Shirao, K ;
Seki, S ;
Saito, H ;
Sakata, Y ;
Hyodo, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :319-323
[3]  
Cohen SJ, 2002, CLIN CANCER RES, V8, P2116
[4]   A COMPARISON OF 3 CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC REGIMENS IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PANCREATIC AND GASTRIC-CARCINOMA - FLUOROURACIL VS FLUOROURACIL AND DOXORUBICIN VS FLUOROURACIL, DOXORUBICIN, AND MITOMYCIN [J].
CULLINAN, SA ;
MOERTEL, CG ;
FLEMING, TR ;
RUBIN, JR ;
KROOK, JE ;
EVERSON, LK ;
WINDSCHITL, HE ;
TWITO, DI ;
MARSCHKE, RF ;
FOLEY, JF ;
PFEIFLE, DM ;
BARLOW, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 253 (14) :2061-2067
[5]   CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF 3 DRUG-COMBINATION REGIMENS VERSUS FLUOROURACIL ALONE FOR THE THERAPY OF ADVANCED GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
CULLINAN, SA ;
MOERTEL, CG ;
WIEAND, HS ;
OCONNELL, MJ ;
POON, MA ;
KROOK, JE ;
MAILLIARD, JA ;
TSCHETTER, LK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (02) :412-416
[6]  
Futatsuki K, 1994, JPN J CANC CHEMOTHER, V21, P1033
[7]   Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer [J].
Glimelius, B ;
Ekstrom, K ;
Hoffman, K ;
Graf, W ;
Sjoden, PO ;
Haglund, U ;
Svensson, C ;
Enander, LK ;
Linne, T ;
Sellstrom, H ;
Heuman, R .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (02) :163-168
[8]  
Hirata K, 1999, CLIN CANCER RES, V5, P2000
[9]  
KIM NK, 1993, CANCER, V71, P3813, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930615)71:12<3813::AID-CNCR2820711205>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-5