A European evaluation of cosmetic treatment of facial volume loss with Juvederm™ Voluma™ in patients previously treated with Restylane Sub-Q™

被引:13
作者
Fischer, Tanja C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Skin & Laser Ctr, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Charite, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
aesthetic; facial filler; hyaluronic acid (HA); Juvederm (TM) VOLUMA (TM); Restylane SubQ (TM); NASOLABIAL FOLDS; MULTICENTER; FILLERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00524.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
Background Juvederm (TM) VOLUMA (TM) (Voluma) is a new injectable, long-lasting, resorbable hyaluronic acid filler. It restores facial volume, resulting in a more youthful appearance. Aims To evaluate current in-market perceptions of the aesthetic result and use of Voluma. Patients/methods Men and women >30 years who had received Restylane SubQ (TM) (Restylane) <2 years previously, now requiring re-treatment and who consented to Voluma treatment were included. Results Eighty-four patients (mean age 51 years, 88% women) were recruited. The mean total volume of Voluma injected was 2.73 mL/patient. This included treatment to both sides of the face, specifically in the malar and chin areas or both (mean 1.36 mL each to the right and left sides of the face). Seventy-five percent of injectors found Voluma fairly/very easy to inject and 84.5% found it easy to sculpt/massage. Most patients (98%) and physicians (98%) rated the aesthetic effect of Voluma as improved. Injectors rated Voluma as better than previous Restylane use in 69.1% of patients (P < 0.001), and preference for Voluma was expressed in 61% of patients (P < 0.001). Ninety-nine percent of injectors would recommend Voluma to colleagues and patients (100%); 96.4% of patients would recommend it to friends. Treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions Voluma is easy to use, sculpt, and massage. Physicians and patients rated the cosmetic effects highly, and both groups reported a preference for Voluma in those patients previously treated with Restylane.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 296
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
[Anonymous], INTRO OVERVIEW VOLUM
[2]
Comparison of smooth-gel hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with cross-linked bovine collagen: A multicenter, double-masked, randomized, within-subject study [J].
Baumann, Leslie S. ;
Shamban, Ava T. ;
Lupo, Mary P. ;
Monheit, Gary D. ;
Thomas, Jane A. ;
Murphy, Diane K. ;
Walker, Patricia S. .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2007, 33 (02) :S128-S135
[3]
Hyaluronic acids [J].
Born, Trevor .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 33 (04) :525-+
[4]
Fagien Steven, 2007, J Cosmet Laser Ther, V9 Suppl 1, P23, DOI 10.1080/17429590701523836
[5]
FINN CJ, 2002, DERMATOL SURG, V29, P450
[6]
Haas Cynthia Figueroa, 2008, Plast Surg Nurs, V28, P177, DOI 10.1097/PSN.0b013e31818ea832
[7]
Volumizing effects of a smooth, highly cohesive, viscous 20-mg/mL hyaluronic acid volumizing filler: prospective European study [J].
Hoffmann, Klaus ;
Grp, Juvederm Voluma Study Inves .
BMC DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 9 :9
[8]
Reliable soft tissue augmentation - A clinical comparison of injectable soft-tissue fillers for facial-volume augmentation [J].
Kanchwala, SK ;
Holloway, L ;
Bucky, LP .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 55 (01) :30-35
[9]
Aesthetic surgery: Diagnosing and healing the miscues of human facial expression [J].
Khan, JA .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 17 (01) :4-6
[10]
A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds [J].
Lindqvist, C ;
Tveten, S ;
Bondevik, BE ;
Fagrell, D .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (01) :282-289